GERRY BRAIDEN and CALUM MacDONALD
Residents opposed to the creation of a Muslim cemetery on the outskirts of a conservation village attended a public meeting to voice their objections last night.
The villagers claim the burial ground would consume 31 acres of green belt land around Carmunnock, just six miles south of Glasgow city centre, effectively ending its status as a distinct village.
However, some Muslim leaders said they were cynical about the grounds for objection. One said he was concerned local communities suddenly became "tree-huggers" when proposals for Islamic places of worship or cemeteries go before planning authorities.
Leaders at Glasgow's Central Mosque want a new graveyard as the current cemetery at Cathcart is nearing capacity.
Residents in Carmunnock, which has a population of just 1400, have mobilised a campaign to stop Glasgow City Council approving the plan.
They insist there are alternative sites available for the project, including within Carmunnock Cemetery itself.
However, Osama Saeed, Scottish spokesman for the Muslim Council of Britain, said that while he believes a row over a cemetery may be a first, objections are commonplace when new mosques are proposed.
He said: "What I find strange is that we're hearing an excuse that this is green belt land; broadly speaking, cemeteries do tend to be green.
"We've heard this from across the UK when new mosques have been proposed and suddenly a whole new breed of tree-huggers emerge, but never with cemeteries.
"The Muslim community in Glasgow has no great attachment to Carmunnock. It is not holy ground. But the problem we have is there are more and more older Muslims, more are dying and we need a burial ground."
The accusation of nimbyism was dismissed by Carmunnock Community Council, which said: "In fact we are urging the city council to offer the Muslim community a three-acre site in the existing Carmunnock Cemetery, which is large enough to service 30 years of burials, as a first step.
"We welcome the Muslim community to the existing Carmunnock Cemetery and this would protect the green belt. Carmunnock Community Council fully supports the Muslim community's request for a cemetery - however, we don't think that needs to be at the expense of the green belt and altering the nature of Carmunnock village."
Dr Mohammed Kausar, the general secretary of the Central Mosque in Glasgow, said: "We have taken into consideration every view. The council and the committees have gone into all the points."
However, the community council claims it has yet to be consulted on the plans and as the cemetery is to be created on a steep hill, it will be noticeable throughout the area.
It dismissed claims that a cemetery would protect the plot of green land from housing or industrial developments.
A spokesman said: "This is a complete red herring. There is no suggestion whatso- ever that there are altern- ative industrial or housing developments.
"This is unhelpful in having a mature, informed debate and verges on attempting to raise fears in the village."
Carmunnock, which lies within the city boundaries of Glasgow, is an ancient settlement which was used as a base by the Welsh saint Cadoc when converting the local population to Christianity 1500 years ago. The old village churchyard, which is no longer used for burials, includes a watch-house with original instructions for grave-watchers of 1828, when grave robbing was still widespread.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article