Andy Murray left the heat of the California desert beaten and disappointed but confident that his best tennis is just around the corner as he heads to the Miami Masters.
The Scot's 6-7, 6-3, 6-1 defeat by Juan Martin Del Potro in the quarter-finals of the BNP Paribas Open ended his hopes of overtaking Roger Federer for the world No 2 spot this week.But with Federer not due to play another tournament until the Madrid Masters in May, Murray's chance to equal his career-high ranking, first achieved in 2009, should come before long.
Del Potro's power, precision and superior match tightness proved Murray's undoing in a match that lasted two-and-a-half hours and was played in temperatures in the mid-90s.
Murray arrived in Indian Wells not expecting to play his best but confident that swapping tournaments for training in February would stand him in good stead and so it proved as he ground his way through three matches to reach the last eight, albeit without ever looking totally fluent.
Del Potro, fully fit again after more problems with his left wrist, played as well as he has done in months and for a rusty Murray, he proved to be a bridge too far.
But compared to the past two years, when he left Indian Wells with a look of thunder on his face after first-match defeats, Murray is much more at ease with himself, the memory of his Olympic and US Open triumphs doubtless still fresh in his memory.
It was a shame that he missed out on a semi-final with world No 1 Novak Djokovic, but he and the Serb, who beat him to win the Australian Open title in January, are likely to meet again soon.
"Novak, I've obviously played a lot recently. Rafa [Nadal] would obviously be interesting to play against but I'm sure I'll get opportunities down the road to play against them," he said.
"I needed to play a match like today to see the things that I need to tighten up on so that hopefully next week if I get the opportunity to play Juan or Rafa or Novak, then I'll hopefully play a better match."
Murray was annoyed with himself for not playing better on the big points against Del Potro but said he was well on his way to rediscovering top form.
"I played some decent stuff against Del Potro," he said. "It just wasn't consistent enough. I didn't play well enough for a long enough period of time to win against a top player.
"It's good that I managed to get four matches here and a couple of doubles, which I haven't had the last couple of years and hopefully that will help me in Miami."
Murray said he had no regrets about training in Miami with his coach Ivan Lendl, rather than play more tournaments, confident it will pay off as the year goes on.
"It was the right thing to do, 100%," he said. "You have to look further down the road sometimes and not just focus on one event.
"The Tour is extremely hard and physical and I hope by taking a break now – I wasn't expecting to play perfect tennis this week or play my best – when I get to French Open, Wimbledon time, hopefully I'll be a bit fresher than I have been the past few years."
With an apartment in Miami and having practised regularly on the courts at Crandon Park, he has an advantage over many of the field for the Masters 1000 event, which begins next weekend. But the conditions in Florida are much heavier than California and Murray knows it will take a little time to readjust. "The first few days practising it does feel unbelievably slow," he said. "But I am feeling good."
Another player feeling good last night was Nadal, who booked his place in the final in Indian Wells with a 6-4, 7-5 victory over Tomas Berdych. After seven months out through injury, the Spaniard made it three finals out of four in his comeback. "For me, this is completely unexpected to be here in the final," said Nadal. "I am very, very happy and very emotional."
Djokovic was due to take on Del Potro in the second semi-final last night.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article