JUST when Andy Murray thinks he's getting back to his best, he runs into Novak Djokovic, again.
Murray's hopes of reaching the final of the BNP Paribas Open came to an end last night with a 6-2, 6-3 defeat by the world No 1, who produced a near-flawless performance to set up a clash with Roger Federer.
Djokovic has now won nine of their past 10 meetings - the exception being the 2013 Wimbledon final - and though Murray served poorly and was not at his best, especially in the first set, it would have taken something extraordinary to deny the Serb.
Going into last night's semi-final Murray will doubtless take plenty of positives from a week in which he played well and he will remind his critics that it is less than two months since he was in a winning position against Djokovic in the final of the Australian Open.
But no one likes being dismantled and Djokovic was superior in every department of the game, particularly on serve, never allowing Murray to attack and ripping into the Scot's first serve almost as much as his second.
When Murray lost in Melbourne, he was angry at himself at allowing himself to be distracted by Djokovic's "rope-a-dope" appearance in the third set, at one stage looking out on his feet before hitting back with a knock-out punch.
Last night, Djokovic was up throughout, never suffering a dip, and was so much in the zone that when asked to sum up his performance, he just stuck to the script.
"I was hoping I would be this comfortable on the court, start with the right intensity," he said.
"I was a bit concerned about how I would adjust to the conditions - I played my other three matches at night - but I made a crucial break at the start, Andy wasn't at his maximum, he made a lot of unforced errors and his first serve percentage was low and that allowed me to be aggressive."
Much has been made of the Murray second serve but it was his first serve that was found wanting, landing only 47% of them and winning only half, a statistic that improved as the match wore on.
Djokovic seemed to be reading the Murray serve and with so much pressure to react, the Scot struggled, especially on the forehand side.
An early break put Djokovic 3-0 up and though he was broken at 5-1, he broke Murray to love to take an opening set that was as clean as he could have hoped.
The second set followed a similar pattern as Djokovic ripped into the Murray first serve and dominated the bulk of the points, soon opening up another 3-0 lead.
Sensing he had to attack to even stand a chance, Murray worked his way into the match and by the end of it, was playing far better but it was too little too late to deny Djokovic who is showing everyone why he is so far clear at the top of the rankings.
The Serb was generous about the Murray serve, pointing out that "when he won Wimbledon and the US Open he was serving really well. [But] I'm sure he knows I'm returning well and I know he's returning well, so that puts an additional pressure on our serves. I tried to add variety on second serve, not give him any rhythm. It worked well."
Murray will remain No 4 in the rankings as he now heads to his second home of Miami for another Masters 1000 event, a tournament where he has twice won the title.
Victory over Djokovic would have lifted him above Rafa Nadal to No 3 after the Spaniard was beaten in the quarter-finals in Indian Wells by Milos Raonic, missing three match points in the second-set tie-break as he lost 4-6, 7-6, 7-5.
Seeing Nadal miss match point chances is not an everyday occurrence but Nadal, who said he was delighted with his form for two sets, described his year as "a process".
"I am not happy that I lost," Nadal, said, with a smile. "[But] feeling that I was there fighting for the victory against a top player again in a good surface for him is a big improvement for me.
"I am happy because I am much closer than one-month-and-a-half ago to where I want to be. I had a lot of chances to win. Maybe I should have."
Ranoic came unstuck against Federer last night, going down 7-5, 6-4, so there will be a repeat of last year's epic final, which was won by Djokovic.
The women's final will be between third seed Simon Halep of Romania and former champion Jelena Jankovic, the Serb who won the title in 2010.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article