It was not the worst of weeks in Madrid for Andy Murray but as the new world No.2 packed his bags and headed for the Italian Open in Rome, he knew that it was an opportunity missed.
The Scot was beaten 7-6, 6-4 by Tomas Berdych in the quarter-finals of the Mutua Madrid Open last night – and that will not sit well with him.
Sure enough, he has banked 180 ranking points while world No.1 Novak Djokovic has lost 135, but Murray could have done so much better. Yet the Scot has not been anywhere near his best all week and last night he was made to pay a heavy price for that.
It is one thing to struggle past the world No.26 Florian Mayer and the world No.17 Gilles Simon on a surface you are not completely comfortable with, but taking on the likes of Berdych – the sixth best player in the world and runner up on the very same court 12 months ago – requires a little bit more than just sheer cussedness.
Despite the fact that he had a gruelling night on Thursday and would not have got to sleep much before 4am, Murray certainly looked brighter and more motivated than he had against Simon in the previous round. Still, there was a nagging doubt about his overall fitness; his left hip appeared to be causing him problems and there was a fear that his back may have been giving him gyp. The backhand was not its usual, reliable self, while his returns – usually his most potent weapon – were not hitting the mark.
Berdych has the reputation of being something of a fragile soul – give him a winning lead and he has a tendency to panic and run in the opposite direction – but coming into last night's match with a 4-4 career record with the Scot, the world No.6 could rest easy. He has now beaten Murray in each of their last three clay court encounters. Smiling at some of Murray's delicate drop shots and then serving his way out trouble on numerous break points, Berdych seemed to be relaxing into the role of Madrid semi-finalist elect.
The pattern was set in the first set when, a break to the good, Murray dropped his serve in an eight-minute game and Berdych was back on level terms at 4-4. "It's impossible to play like this," the Scot muttered to himself. After little more than two hours of frustration on the centre court, he was proved right.
At least he refrained from hitting himself in the face with his own racket. That was left to Rafa Nadal, although the Spaniard regained his composure in time to see off compatriot David Ferrer 4-6, 7-6 (7-3), 6-0 to reach the semi-finals.
Nadal had a scare when leading 4-0 in the third set when his racket bounced up off the court as he was stretching down to play a shot and struck him above the eye. After a brief interruption he was able to continue and closed out the victory on his first match point when he broke Ferrer for a seventh time. "I think maybe David deserved more than me to be in the semi-finals but that's sport for you," said Nadal.
There might have been a similar sentiment hanging over the court on which women's world No.1 Serena Williams was given her first serious test yesterday. The American was subjected to a merciless 6-0 mauling in the second set but was still able to scramble into the semi-finals with a 6-3, 0-6, 7-5 victory over Spaniard Anabel Medina Garrigues. Williams will meet Sara Errani, the seventh-seeded Italian, in the next round.
The last time Williams lost a set to love was in November 2008 against her sister Venus, at the WTA Championships in Qatar. "I wasn't really there," she said. "I wasn't really in it. My feet weren't moving. I don't know what happened."
She is joined in the semi-finals by Maria Sharapova after the Russian defeated the unseeded Estonian Kaia Kanepi 6-2, 6-4. "I was just happy to get past the quarter-finals," said Sharapova. "I feel like I've been stuck in this tournament."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article