In the afterglow of her Wimbledon triumph, Marion Bartoli was adamant about one thing.
"Really, just to be on court is so much my passion that I just want to do it as long as possible, for a number of years," she said. "It's not going to be a problem for me to have motivation."
On Wednesday night, after losing to Simona Halep in Cincinnati, Bartoli announced that she had played her last match; that years of battling injuries had taken their toll; that, just two months short of her 29th birthday, it was the right time to retire.
It was an announcement that was met with dismay, disappointment and overall, surprise. This was a woman who two days beforehand, said her body had told her she was ready to get back on court, who was excited about heading to the US Open as the Wimbledon champion.
Somewhere, something changed and the only thing to be said with any certainty is that Bartoli has always done things her own way. Just like Bjorn Borg, who walked away after losing to John McEnroe in the US Open final of 1981 and never played another grand slam event, this was a huge shock.
Amelie Mauresmo, the former world No.1 who has been working as a coaching consultant to Bartoli this year, didn't know it was coming. Nor did her fellow players. Only her father, the much-maligned Walter Bartoli, sensed something when his daughter called him to tell him the news.
"He understood; he even sensed it," Bartoli said in French, to sports newspaper L'Equipe. "He was not at all telling me, 'But no, you will continue.' Quite the contrary. He is very happy for me, for all I did. He is very proud and that is the most important."
Others have quit at the top - Pete Sampras never played another match after winning the US Open in 2002 (though he did not officially retire until 12 months later); Justine Henin was world No.1 when she quit for the first time in 2008 and Borg was still right up there when he walked away from the sport.
"It becomes an ordeal when I can't even really walk because I have so much pain in my Achilles tendon, or I have so much pain in my shoulder or my rib or in my lower back that I can't even serve after one set," she said in Cincinnati. "It all means that at a certain point, the body has its limits and I went past them. I was obliged to do so many times to make it, and I achieved the most beautiful goal of my life, my career. And now it's time to move on to other things."
Henin, Martina Hingis and even Kim Clijsters all came back and as the tennis world tried to digest the news, several predicted a comeback for Bartoli, too.
"What she did at Wimbledon was fantastic, but she will regret this decision when Wimbledon comes," said Goran Ivanisevic, who is playing on the ATP Champions Tour this week. "There is nothing like playing at Wimbledon as 'Wimbledon champion'. I couldn't defend - I was injured."
And Guy Forget, who knows Bartoli well from his time as Fed Cup captain, urged her to take her time before making a final decision. "I hope she is going to change her mind," he said. "My message would be: just don't rush it. Take time, go to the beach for a few days, go running in the park, just get your head together, spend some time with your friends.
"If you don't want to play next week, don't play. If you want to miss the US Open, fine. But just don't quit, don't take such a radical decision only a few weeks after winning the biggest tournament in the world."
Bartoli was one of the quirkiest players on the court and most interesting characters off it. She is strong enough to stick to her guns but if she wants to come back, then she will be welcomed back with open arms. Either way, it will be her decision.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article