UNITED States investigators are still keen to establish the veracity
of the claim by a Palestinian revolutionary that he, and not two
Libyans, carried out the 1988 Lockerbie airliner bombing.
Yesterday, the US State Department said it would pursue the confession
although, privately, Washington sources say the confession is not to be
trusted. However, their position varies from that of the Foreign Office
in London and the prosecuting authorities in Scotland, who have
indicated that the Western allies' policy of prosecuting the two Lybians
is still the only one they wish to pursue.
Three weeks ago, Youssef Shaaban, a member of the Abu Nidal
Revolutionary Council Faction, who is on trial for the murder of a
Jordanian diplomat, was reported to have confessed to the bombing of
PanAm flight 103 which killed all 259 people on board and 11 on the
ground.
Almost immediately, the situation was confused, first with claims that
Shaaban had been mis-quoted and then with a subsequent claim that he had
''confessed'' only under ''coercion and torture''.
In November, 1991, the US and Britain accused Libyans Abdel Basset Ali
Mohamed al-Megrahi and al-Amin Khalifa Fhimah of having carried out the
Lockerbie atrocity.
The indictments against the pair, who are alleged to be members of the
Lybian secret service, were issued by the Crown Office in Scotland. The
US and British governments, backed by the United Nations, have made
repeated, unsuccessful, demands for their extradition to stand trial in
Scotland.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article