THE career of Dennis David Woodman, a major Crown witness in the
Arthur Thompson Jr murder trial at the High Court in Glasgow, is exposed
tonight in harsh detail in Granada TV's World In Action. It casts doubts
yet again on his use by the Scottish authorities.
Woodman, known in England as Wilkinson or by other aliases, gave five
days of colourful evidence, claiming Mr Paul Ferris, the accused, had
confessed to him while they were in the segregation unit at Barlinnie
Prison. However, his testimony was wrecked by incisive cross-examination
from Mr Donald Findlay, QC.
Despite a considerable body of better quality evidence in what was
Scotland's longest murder trial, the jury acquitted Mr Ferris on all
charges.
The use of Woodman, one Crown source later said, meant ''the baby was
thrown out with the bath water''.
Mr Steve Bolton, the programme's producer, said yesterday: ''When we
first started hearing of Wilkinson/Woodman's use as a witness in the
Ferris case, we were astonished because we already knew a lot about his
background. It was very clear he had reached the end of his shelf life
in the English courts after seven or eight cases.
''In the case of Kevin Wong at Chester Crown Court, the Judge said he
would be unhappy if the jury convicted on the evidence of Woodman alone.
Peter Brockelsby was cleared at Leeds Crown Court after other prisoners
described Woodman reading court papers beforehand to brief himself.
''His career of lying, aside from the damage he did to individuals, is
a black comedy.''
The programme examines why Woodman, now in the protection wing at
Peterhead Prison, serving a lengthy sentence for the kidnapping of a
Dumfries farmer, began his career as a police informer. It followed an
earlier kidnapping accompanied by sadistic treatment of the victim.
Woodman feared a life sentence. However, a witness says on screen, if
he could show the Judge he had helped the prosecution in other cases, he
could then expect a substantial reduction.
He was held in Risley Remand Centre and, says World In Action, a
string of men who had previously protested their innocence suddenly
queued up to confess to Woodman. The police and a number of English
Judges and juries then accepted his evidence.
World In Action have, however, unearthed another former Risley inmate
who speaks of Woodman attempting to get him to go to the police and say
he had overheard other criminals admitting crimes.
After Woodman assisted the police, a detective inspector spoke for him
in court. For charges of theft, fraud, false imprisonment, indecent
assault, and wounding with intent he received only six years.
The programme then describes how Woodman offered appeal lawyers deals
to retract his evidence for the Crown if he was paid to do so. Also
revealed is the help given to Woodman by the police after he left jail.
After his record as a supergrass was exposed in English newspapers,
Woodman said he hoped for police protection and for rehousing. It was
five years later that he re-emerged in Scotland.
Glasgow solicitor Peter Forbes says on screen that ''it just seemed
inconceivable that anyone would shout details of such a major crime to
any other party in the segregation unit and for Paul Ferris to have done
it was totally and utterly inconceivable.''
World In Action journalist Andrew Bell said yesterday: ''Only a few
weeks ago, John Major was talking about blowing away the cobwebs of
secrecy yet whenever we asked anyone in an official position in Scotland
to talk about the Ferris case they dived for cover.
''I asked the Crown Office, the procurator-fiscal's office in Glasgow,
and Strathclyde Police but none would speak. Strathclyde Police told us
that the case was still sub judice but both the Crown Office and the
procurator-fiscal's office told us this was nonsense.
''We approached two prison governors to interview prisoners under the
more relaxed guidelines which are now in force and both seemed more than
happy to let us in. They were jumped on by the Scottish Office. They
would give us no reason or tell us who had made the decision.''
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article