THE world's first offshore wave-power station, the Osprey 1 was said
to be a ''write-off'' last night after it keeled over partially
submerged in a storm.
The #4m Clyde-built structure was caught by the tail-end of Hurricane
Felix and was slewed round and partly sunk in the sea 300-yards off
Dounreay, Caithness, yesterday afternoon.
The local laird, Mr Geoffrey Minter, whose Sandside House is only one
mile from the 75ft-high wave-power station, said last night that the
structure had almost completely disappeared under the waves.
Earlier in the day he said that only a third of the structure that is
supposed to be above the waterline was still showing. ''That is now
leaning over at a 45-degree angle, instead of being vertical as it
should be''.
Powerful Atlantic waves lashed against the already-damaged body of
Osprey, which was launched amid considerable publicity early this month
from the UIE yard at Clydebank.
Late last week, and before this major setback caused by the weekend's
storm, the innovative turbines were removed as a precaution from Osprey,
an acronym for Ocean Swell Powered Renewable Energy.
Then holes were found above the waterline and cracks were seen on
steel welds below the surface, while some metal panels came loose and
fell into the sea.
This was despite the fact that the Pentland Firth area had enjoyed the
calmest seas for years, as the North of Scotland basked in this summer's
heatwave.
Towards the end of last week insurance loss-adjusters were called in
by the designers and owners of the ''green energy'' Osprey concept,
Applied Research and Technology of Seafield Road, Longman Industrial
Estate, Inverness.
Last night Mr Allan Thomson, managing director of ART, confirmed that
the damaged Osprey was likely to be a ''write-off''. He said that the
damage was so severe that the unique power-machine would probably have
to be scrapped.
Mr Thomson said that the damage to the ballast tanks suffered during
the installation of the prototype Osprey 1 had ''now progressed to the
stage where repair is unlikely to be viable''. He said: ''Obviously this
is a disappointment for us''.
Mr Minter, who chairs Scrabster Harbour Trustees said: ''It does seem
such a shame. The waves were quite rough over the weekend, but nothing
unusual for this part of the world.''
Late last week, experts working for ART were examining ways of
removing Osprey to a sheltered location -- probably Loch Eriboll, the
deepwater former Naval Wartime anchorage near Cape Wrath, Sutherland --
to allow repairs to take place.
The European Union invested #500,000 in the venture, while Inverness
and Nairn Enterprise company contributed a grant of #350,000.
Several big name private sector companies also made contributions, and
the device was put into the sea off Dounreay, not only to ''harvest''
the power of waves which make the north coast of Caithness popular with
surfers, but also to tap into the National Grid.
Osprey was designed to push air, forced up and down by the movement of
the waves and compressed by the shape of the structure, through patented
electricity-generating turbines designed by wave-power expert Professor
Allan Wells, formerly of Queen's University, Belfast.
Mr Thomson said that identifying and solving problems was a function
of development engineers and added: ''It is at times like this that you
realise that your insurance premiums were well spent''. The machine was
insured on Lloyd's London Marine Market.
Mr Thomson also confirmed that ART intends to build a second Osprey as
soon as possible, which could be ready in six-months' time and be in the
water by next spring.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article