JULIAN Dicks steps straight into the cauldron of a Merseyside derby
with instructions from his new manager not to change his style.
The former West Ham full-back, who was swapped for Mike Marsh and
David Burrows in a deal worth #2.5m, takes his place in a formidable
defence alongside Graeme Souness's other hard-man signing, Neil Ruddock.
Dicks, 25, is not worried about his reputation -- he has been sent off
eight times -- nor the fact that the majority of the 40,000 Goodison
Park crowd will be on his back.
He said: ''I'm not worried at all. When I was at Birmingham, I was
only 17 when I made my debut against Aston Villa, so I know what derbies
are all about.'' Dicks revealed that Souness has warned him about his
lack of self discipline, but hasn't ordered him to change his style.
''He said go out and play the way you usually play. Obviously we
talked about my disciplinary record, but that's all over and done with
now.'' Meanwhile, Souness tried to avoid comparisons with Ruddock who
also joined the club with a ''wild man'' reputation.
''I think -- like those who have witnessed Ruddock since he's been
here -- he's a very good footballer. He's just got a reputation for
getting into trouble which he feels he's gone some way to sorting out,''
said Souness.
''He's a good footballer, the same as Ruddock, and sometimes people
forget to write about that bit.''
Meanwhile, Portsmouth striker Lee Chapman has joined the Hammers in a
#250,000 deal.
Chapman, 33, completed his surprise move last night. The former Leeds
striker rejected the London side in the summer in favour of Portsmouth
-- but is believed to have been unhappy about travelling to the south
coast from Yorkshire.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article