Ken Smith explains why the Clyde's Erskine Bridge will never recoup its investment
TO some it is simply the bridge to nowhere. It was built at a time when Erskine was forecast to become a booming new town on the banks of the Clyde.
In the end Erskine failed to develop, the forecast traffic for the Erskine Bridge failed to materialise, and its construction debt has soared to many times the millions it cost to build.
The Erskine Bridge became the white elephant of Scotland's road system, with civil servants at the Scottish Office admitting that it would never recoup its costs in tolls.
It was impossible to make the tolls cost-effective, as pushing them too high would simply make drivers go elsewhere. Unlike the Skye Bridge, there are alternative routes.
Yet the tolls will remain for at least another five years, says the Scottish Office, angering local communities, who say they should be abolished to boost traffic and tempt motorists away from the Clyde's congested crossings at the Clyde Tunnel and the Kingston Bridge.
There is also a darker side to the Erskine Bridge. Like many crossings around the world it became a magnet for unfortunates considering suicide, who would take one last look at the bright lights of Glasgow before plunging into the Clyde. Some 17 people were dying on average every year on the bridge, prompting the Government to spend thousands of pounds on additional security cameras and higher parapets at either end.
The bridge cost #10m and was opened in 1971 by Princess Anne with the traditional snipping of the ribbon. But the cost did not end there. Three years ago a further #5m had to be spent on resurfacing work, adding to the mounting debt.
The Scottish Office saw most of the income swallowed up by the cost of providing 22 toll collectors, six supervisors, and four administrative assistants to take in the money.
It even considered sacking the collectors and putting in automatic machines instead. In the end it decided on privatising the collection of the tolls, which made some savings but did little to reduce the debt.
Perhaps its most controversial customer has been the nuclear convoys taking warheads to be fitted into the Polaris submarines based on the Clyde. Protesters would try to stop the convoys on the bridge to highlight what they saw as the potential dangers of using a bridge for such cargoes.
But their protests never caused much of a hold-up. There was never enough traffic on the bridge to do so.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article