TWO of the four companies bidding for the next franchise to run ScotRail revealed some of their plans for Scotland's national train operator yesterday.
Speaking for the first time about its bid, NedRailways, the state-owned operator in the Netherlands, said it would concentrate on how to squeeze more trains into an already crowded rail network.
NedRailways will look at running double-decker trains in Scotland, although the cost of altering tunnels and other infrastructure would probably be too expensive and disruptive.
The Herald revealed last week that National Express, the incumbent, had been shortlisted alongside First, Arriva, and a joint venture between Netherlands Railways and Serco.
NedRailways claims are
likely to be disputed by National Express. Peter Cotton, managing director of ScotRail, has warned that it is fantasy for any overseas operator to believe it can improve the system.
Meanwhile, First said its aim was to offer a door-to-door service by integrating its buses with ScotRail's 2000 daily trains.
However, it will have to persuade the competition authorities that it can bid without selling some of its bus companies.
It has 55% of the Scottish bus market and would have a public transport monopoly on some routes if it won ScotRail.
The seven-year ScotRail contract, which could be worth (pounds) 1.6bn in subsidy from the Scottish Executive, is due to start when National Express's current deal ends next March.
National Express and First are considered the early favourites because NedRailways and Serco are an unknown quantity.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article