A LEADING engineering consultant admitted last night that major
hurdles had to be overcome before a new multi-million super stadium
could be built for Celtic Football Club at Cambuslang.
Mr Brian Veitch, managing director of Ove Arup, which is involved in
the #45m development, revealed that the land was riddled with old mine
workings as well as suffering serious ground contamination.
His disclosure was made during a public meeting organised by
Cambuslang Community Council to allow the club to outline its ambitious
proposals to site a new 52,000 capacity international events stadium in
the area.
The consultant, whose company has been involved in similar
developments throughout the world, told the packed meeting that further
investigations were planned to measure levels of contamination
previously dumped on the site. The indications, he said, were that the
contamination was not highly toxic.
However, he urged the public, who had information surrounding previous
work on the land, to come forward and share this. Mr Veitch explained
that maps detailing some of the old mineshafts had been obtained,
although it was feared that not all were known.
Despite this, he remained confident that any difficulties could be
overcome without any serious risk to the public. ''There are safe and
well tried ways of dealing with contamination,'' Mr Veitch explained.
Mr Kevin Kelly, the chairman of Celtic FC, who missed his club's
Scottish Cup replay against Clyde to attend the meeting, told the
audience that the development would provide a major jobs boost for the
area with approximately 2100 new jobs.
But one resident argued that the quality of life in the Cambuslang
area would suffer seriously as a result of the project. He feared that
the area was being sacrificed for the benefit of Glasgow, and that
property prices would fall.
Mr Alastair Hamilton, vice-chairman of Cambuslang Community Council,
explained that the meeting had been arranged after a number of requests
from local organisations and individuals concerning the plans, which
have been lodged with Glasgow District Council.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article