UNTIL recently, I was a Labour supporter for more than 50 years. I remember Jack Straw as the bagman to the dear, late Barbara Castle [pictured] at her parliamentary seat in Blackburn and at Westminster. She was an excellent mentor and from her profound experience she guided and tutored Straw through the complexities of high-level political activities.
Straw succeeded her as Blackburn MP. After a stint as home secretary Blair saw fit to move him to the Foreign Office. Far from being resolute and impressive in the role, he has dithered, changed his mind, prevaricated, and been a total failure. He appears to have settled as Blair's poodle just as Blair is Bush's poodle.
Poor Barbara will be spinning in her grave. Had she been alive she would have straightened both Blair and Straw out with a few rasping, logical guidelines in their ears and influenced a considerable change for the better. We urgently need changes at the top. Has Gordon Brown lost his tongue?
James Dougan,
2 Friars Park, Lanark.
I found myself in almost complete agreement with A B Robertson's diagnosis and sentiments about caning New Labour as hard as possible in the Holyrood election (Letters, February 14), although I ceased to cast an automatic Labour vote when Harold Wilson's ''white heat of technological revolution'' died to a dull cherry red. Granted that True Labour (as distinct from New Labour) voters might find individuals in some of the other parties who would not be too incompatible, in their political ideas and intentions, the effect of such haphazard defection might be even more damaging to our already ailing political process.
I am fortunate in that, living in West Falkirk, the Canavan Factor or, if that name seems too reminiscent of Messianic Blairism, the Falkirk Factor, saves me from the dilemma. Given that the media are telling us that Labour activists and voters in Scotland are increasingly estranged from the warmongering leadership and its habits of institutionalised carpet-baggery would it not make sense if they worked to ensure that there were independent or True Labour local and parliamentary candidates available at the next elections thereby not caning their party but reviving and renewing it?
In this way the Canavan Effect, which ensures that the ''man'' (or ''woman'' of course) is not merely a hollow tube through which the one-way-only ''Message'' is conveyed to a bewildered and disillusioned faithful, could be spread throughout Scotland to the benefit of all.
Geo S Neil Mochrie,
16 Heugh Street, Falkirk.
IT has been suggested that if the war on Iraq is short and ''bloodless'' it should be seen as some sort of success for Tony Blair's leadership. It is difficult to imagine how, with the military might at the disposal of the US, the Iraqis could hold out for any length of time. We want to make it clear as Labour Party members that we are opposed to this war in principle, because it will mean possibly hundreds of thousands of lives lost in order to shore up US global leadership in general and US control of global oil in particular.
It would, therefore, be an international, criminal act. We oppose it because even one human life lost is too bloody. It is clear that the war is not supported by a majority in the country and in the Labour Party and trade-union movement. If Blair endorses this war, however short, he, and those who support him, sacrifice the moral and political right to lead the Labour Party.
Councillor Aileen Colleran, Gordon Brown, Pauline Bryan, John Craig, Alex Falconer, Rozanne Foyer, Tom Guthrie, Lynn Henderson, John McAllion, MSP, Simon Macfarlane, Councillor Tom McKeown, Mike McNicholl, Bob Thomson, Vince Mills, Dave Moxham, Bryan Poole, Alex Smith, Elaine Smith, MSP,
c/o 22 Lynedoch Street, Glasgow.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article