A ROW between former Socialist comrades over party funds has resulted in the police being asked to intervene in Shetland.
Allison Kane, the Scottish Socialist Party national treasurer, claimed the decision to transfer funds to Tommy Sheridan's breakaway Solidarity party was "nothing short of stealing".
Most SSP members and branches in the Highlands and Islands have defected to the new party, but the Shetland membership has voted unanimously to stay in the SSP and is furious at the way the issue of funds was handled at a meeting in Inverness earlier this month.
Kevin Learmonth, the Shetland branch chairman, has complained to the police, with Chief Inspector Malcolm Bell confirming: "There has been a report made to us and we are conducting preliminary enquiries to establish whether or not this is a criminal matter."
Mr Learmonth has also written to the Royal Bank of Scotland, saying: "It is my belief that the meeting in Inverness was held to perpetuate a fraud by removing money from my organisation and transferring (it) to another through means of renaming a bank account.
"Our share of the funds in these accounts have now been laundered so as to hide the original source of the funds, and with the signatories changed, we no longer have authority to control how these funds are then spent, administered or prevent funds being passed to unknown third party organisations."
As SSP national treasurer, Ms Kane claims she only discovered by chance that the funds had been moved, adding: "It is very serious to attempt to remove monies in this way. It is nothing short of stealing.
"It's a bit like my joining an animal rights organisation and making a donation, then six months later, phoning them up to say, I don't support you any more, give me back my money so I can pay it to Greenpeace instead."
Steve Arnott, the former SSP organiser in the Highlands, who has moved to Solidarity and is a spokesman for the new party, said the transfer of funds was "perfectly legal".
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article