IN the days leading up to the court appearance that was finally to
wreck his life and bury his career, Eric Cullen spoke to The Herald,
baring his soul about the harrowing traumas of his childhood, his
tortured youth and young adulthood, and how he was pulled inexorably
into the jaws of ruin.
What he missed most, he said, was the laughter. The laughter stopped
for all time yesterday. Why had he pled guilty, The Herald asked, when
he had an answer, or at least a partial answer, for each of the charges?
''I could never have pled not guilty,'' he said, ''because I could not
possibly face Frank Currens. It would be impossible for me.
''And if I were to plead not guilty on the charge from the BB camp
they would have to drag in about 80 or 90 boys for no reason at all.
They were all interviewed by the procurator-fiscal and everyone cleared
me. It would be totally unfair on the kids and the charge is absolute
nonsense.
''I took videos every year at the BB camp yet the police took out a
15-second clip from all these hours . . .''
The police, he says, took away every single video from his house . . .
Rab C Nesbitt films, pantomimes, family videos, youth groups, theatre
groups, Boys Brigade -- many many hours and from that they took out 15
seconds. A copy of that same video was given to one of the BB leaders, a
woman. She was shown it at the police station and she said to the fiscal
in a sworn statement that she saw nothing sexual in the tape at all.
Why, asks Eric Cullen, was she not charged with possession of the tape?
''Why were the other victims of Currens and the other two men who
abused me never charged? Someone else came forward and handed in videos,
yet no-one else has been charged. That is just one of many
inconsistencies. Another one concerns the man who allegedly came forward
anonymously and told them about Currens. How could he be anonymous when
the police said at the briefing that he had died of Aids? They must have
know him.
''I was charged with simple possession, no question of using that
material for gratification or anything else.
''Had they believed that stuff was really mine they should have
charged me on day one. Instead there was ten weeks delay. Had they not
known anything about Frank Currens they should have interviewed me there
and then. Instead the police never came near me.
''The video machines they took from my house were both broken. They
took away my word-processor. From that came the rumours that I had used
it to link up with a paedophile ring in Amsterdam. I couldn't load the
dishwasher far less use a computer for that.''
Cullen gave a different version of events in relation to the charge on
the banks of the River Clyde, saying that he had been forced to lie on
the ground and expose himself to Francis Currens, who took that
photograph.
''I had no choice although people will argue that I had. I was 21 so
people will say I was old enough but I was conditioned to being
photographed naked since I was 13 and it did not mean much to me. It was
just part and parcel of the whole humiliation I had suffered since I was
13.''
Cullen spent more than four years in a special needs unit at
Motherwell College because of his early behavioural and slow-learning
difficulties. What people did not realise was that this was due to the
constant abuse he was suffering as a youth. After four years he gained
the Highers he needed for entry to college but even while there he was
being constantly raped because, he says, his abusers still saw him as
the young boy they had first molested.
One of the most difficult incidents in Cullen's life was the tracing
of his natural mother by the social services followed by a meeting in
her house at Elderslie after months and months of preparation.
''I had hoped to keep it quiet but my natural mother contacted the
tabloids and it turned into a circus. Then when all this scandal blew up
she was quoted as saying that she blamed my adoptive family for my
sexual abuse alleging that they had not done enough to protect me. That
was just total nonsense.
''I was taken to public toilets to do things with men. There are a lot
of men out there who have a part of my childhood and they have stolen
it. My relative got pleasure out of watching other people doing it, as
did Frank Currens. That is a recurring theme.
''In the last two years my anger has become more directed against that
relative who I believed loved me. I now regard myself as totally
asexual. I am petrified of relationships. I have a fear of physical
contact, even having a friend put his arm round me.
''I withdrew from Nesbitt because of ill health. There was a rumour
that I was sacked but that was not true. I am hoping and praying that I
can get my career back. I have had my childhood stolen and then my
adulthood stolen, two years of my life completely wrecked and I have
been virtually imprisoned. If I get my career completely taken away I am
being punished again for the sins of other people. It is simply not
fair.
''The only thing I know how to do reasonably well is to make people
laugh. I think I have lost out on the laughter and that is what I have
missed most in the last two years. People used to laugh but they do not
laugh now.
''Bill and Caroline's kids have been very important to me. Kids do not
hurt you.''
Eric Cullen told The Herald: ''I have never known what it is to ask
for sympathy. When you go through your childhood being raped and not
growing taller than a ten year old it is a word that is not in your
vocabulary. I know what it is like to scream for mercy but never to
receive any.''
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article