A film studio backed by Sean Connery could be operating in the actor's home city of Edinburgh by 2001, the head of Scottish Screen said yesterday.
A consortium which includes Sony and Scottish businessmen is looking for a site and may be able to conclude a deal by Christmas, according to Mr John Archer, chief executive of the publicly-funded film agency.
He said Connery had been a major factor in the choice of Edinburgh and that executives from Sony, which owns Columbia Pictures, were attracted by Edinburgh's reputation as a cultural centre with a major international festival.
The film studio would bring hundreds of jobs to the city, from security and catering to film technicians and actors.
Scottish Screen has long been trying to attract such a development to Scotland.
Mr Archer dismissed suggestions the plan was an act of ''political revenge'' on Mr Connery's part, aimed at the Government which denied him a knighthood.
He confirmed the actor had held talks with Scottish Screen and the giant Sony Corporation about a multi-million pound investment. He said: ''The interest of Sean Connery and Sony in creating a film studio in Scotland has nothing at all do with politics, although I am sure any investment he makes here in the film industry would be seen as a patriotic gesture.
''It is far too big a financial deal to be an act of political revenge. I think the Government would welcome this kind of investment.''
Mr Archer made his comments after speculation by film industry insiders that the actor became interested in the project after being denied a knighthood because of his outspoken support for the SNP.
The speculation appears to centre on a disclosure earlier this year that the actor, who donates #50,000 a year to the nationalists, had been nominated for the honour but was blocked by Scottish Secretary Donald Dewar from receiving the award.
Talks involving Sony, Connery, and a group of Scottish businessmen and financiers, are understood to have been under way for at least two months.
Scottish Screen, which has actively supported the concept of publicly financed studios at Pacific Quay in Glasgow but has stressed it was open to alternatives, is involved in brokering the studio deal.
The studio would take the dual role of a physical space where films are made and a company that makes films. Estimated building costs are about #10m.
If it proceeds, the studio could make 20 films in its first five years, with Connery starring in some of the releases. Estimates of the cost of the films are conservatively placed at #60m.
Mr Archer yesterday welcomed Connery's initiative. He said it was in line with Scottish Screen's desire to attract Hollywood studios to invest in Scotland: ''Any kind of film development is an investment risk. The more that can be taken on with private rather than public investment, the better.''
However, British film director Alan Parker was dismissive of the idea. Speaking last night at a Directors' Guild of Great Britain event to mark his film-making successes, he said: ''If he (Connery) comes back to England and stops living in Spain, he'll raise somebody's hopes.''
He said all Connery had got was a headline in the newspapers.
Nevertheless, Mr Archer said he believed the studio would help upgrade technical film skills in Scotland and Glasgow's role at the centre of film and broadcasting in Scotland would be complemented rather than damaged by the move.
It is thought the project could be up and running by 2001.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article