A BRIDGE linking Bute with the mainland may be the only answer to
combat high ferry fares and a lack of late-night services, a Government
sponsored survey has revealed.
The survey, carried out by Argyll and the Islands Enterprise, is
critical of the island's ferry operator Caledonian MacBrayne for failing
to provide a competitive service and leaving islanders stranded during
the winter after its early evening crossing.
Business groups are preparing to stage a public meeting to tell CalMac
to reappraise its service or risk hastening the demise of Bute's
economy.
Most Bute residents want to keep their special island status but 55%
of the 3000 who responded to the Lec survey said they would welcome a
permanent road link to span the Kyles of Bute to Colintraive on the
Cowal peninsula rather than continue facing high fares.
The third of a mile crossing between Rhubodaich on Bute and
Colintraive is one of the most costly ferry crossings by distance in
Europe at 70p per person and #5.20 for a car.
Travellers have also complained about charges for the half-hour
crossing across the Clyde from Rothesay to Wemyss Bay.
CalMac charges #2.55 per person and #9.10 for a car of less than four
metres long for this monopoly route, which is significantly higher than
the #2.10 per person and #5.70 for any car using its crossing between
Dunoon and Gourock, where it faces competition from Western Ferries.
The survey, which was commissioned by the Bute Transport Users Group,
showed that 71% of islanders wished to see a fast ferry/transport link
to Glasgow with 85% calling for reduced total travel time between the
island and the city.
On existing sailings, 24% welcomed the increased summer timetable but
wanted these extended to winter services. Other improvements requested
were late-night sailings, especially at weekends, special visitors
tickets, driver's fare included in the car price, and secure parking for
vehicles at terminals.
Further demands included the charging of cars at a single rate instead
of by length, less disparity of charges between the Rothesay and Dunoon
routes, a better range of concessionary and reduced fares, and
improvements to CalMac staff attitudes.
Dunoon-based Database Direct (Scotland) Research Division, authors of
the survey, claimed the views of the islanders were compounded by the
fact that in the absence of competition CalMac decisions were simplified
to maximise profits or minimise losses.
Mr Jim Lyle, president of Bute Merchants' Association, said: ''This
survey is a damning endictment of its service to this island. A bridge
would seem to many to be the only alternative to the problems we face.''
Mr Ray Dalton, chairman of Bute Transport Users Group, said the survey
was instigated to add weight to a campaign to improve the island's ferry
service.
''It costs an average family in a car #30 to come here, so the effect
on day trippers alone is obvious, while fares are prohibitive to
companies operating on the island,'' he said.
Mr Dalton said a public meeting would be called to decide how to lobby
both the Government and the ferry company.
However, a spokesman for CalMac said the options of a competing
service or a bridge were ''ridiculous'' and defended his company's
pricing policy. He claimed CalMac had never received complaints about
staff attitude.
He said options of 10 journey tickets which offer up to a #7.20 saving
on the normal single fares on the Wemyss Bay service and short break
returns of #3.70 proved the company was committed to providing
concessions.
Leader Comment14
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article