BANK of Scotland yesterday played down reports that top Scots businessman Sir Alistair Grant was set to become its next governor.
A spokesman for the bank said he had no comment on the reports in two English Sunday newspapers but pointed out that there was no obligation on the present Governor Sir Bruce Pattullo to retire at age 60, which he will reach in January.
The fact that he will be 60 at the time of the group's next annual meeting has heightened speculation about when Sir Bruce will step down and about his successor.
Sir Alistair is seen as an obvious candidate given his stature as one of Scotland's most senior business figures.
He is presently chairman of Scottish & Newccastle and if he took the bank governership as well this would make him the un- disputed leader of Scottish business.
Sir Alistair was one of the architects of the Safeway supermarket chain and he stepped down as chairman last January.
He has no formal knowledge of banking though will know much about the bank's business as he has been a non-executive director since 1992.
Experience of banking is not necessarily a qualification for the governership. Sir Bruce's predecessor was Sir Thomas Risk, a lawyer by profession.
On the surface Sir Alistair appears almost as committed against tax-raising powers for a Scottish parliament as Sir Bruce though there are indications from his past which suggests he is not ideologically opposed.
In the last S&N annual report, Sir Alistair criticised the proposed tax-raising powers as likely to scare away inward investment, damage Scotland's competitiveness and make it harder for business to recruit managerial talent.
This followed Sir Bruce's swingeing attack on the subject. He argued last month that it was not essential that the parliament have tax-raising powers.
At S&N's annual meeting, shortly after Sir Bruce's broadside, Sir Alistair appeared to adopt a more conciliatory tone, saying that Scottish business ''might'' be at a dis- advantage should the tax-raising powers be used. Last year he spoke out in favour devolution though he stressed he did not believe in separatism.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article