The Scottish Rugby Union have been forced into a humiliating climb-down after their plans to introduce a semi-professional super league at the top end of the club game met with fierce opposition from the wider rugby community.
The proposals were unveiled in December, as part of a strategic plan to raise the quality of the club, academy and women's rugby. In detail, the Union said they would fund an elite level of clubs, using some contracted semi-professional players, and would also provide coaching support.
The move was inspired by poor displays by Scottish sides in the British and Irish Cup, where Gala, Stirling County and Edinburgh Accies suffered heavy defeats by better-funded clubs from England, Ireland and Wales, and recognition that Edinburgh and Glasgow - the Union's two pro sides - need a better feeder stream of talent.
A new league of eight top clubs, to be called the Scottish Super League, was to be established ahead of season 2015/16, governed directly by members of the SRU board and senior club representatives. In effect, those clubs would come under direct administration from the Union, creating a clear division between them and the country's purely amateur sides.
After a hostile reaction from other clubs, the SRU have now performed an embarrassing U-turn.
Officially, implementation has only been delayed until season 2016/17, but the fault lines the proposals have revealed suggest it may have to be shelved indefinitely. As in the 1990s, when there was a plan to create a professional district structure, it appears a fear of "player poaching" has been a major factor in resistance.
"Although many clubs accept and appreciate the need for increased quality at the top end of our amateur game there is concern the proposed model creates tensions lower down the leagues and the semi-professional level we recommend may result in a player drain from National and Championship clubs," said SRU chief executive Mark Dodson in a letter to Scottish clubs.
He said the Union's proposals to help women's rugby and the academy structure would go ahead.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article