THE Scottish medal haul at last weekend's British indoor athletics championships in Sheffield - eight including four gold - is a further encouraging sign that legacy is being built on.
Over the two British outdoor and three indoor championships since London 2012, Scots have won 49 medals, 18 of them gold.
In the five UK championships prior to the London Olympics (three outdoor, two indoor) Scots won 31 medals, seven of them gold.
The improvement is nothing short of spectacular. At the indoor championships immediately following London 2012, Scots claimed three medals of each colour, the best performance for 18 years. More Scots are featuring in GB rankings (seven at No.1 in the latest edition) and 15 Scottish records have fallen across all age groups since January 1. Add increasing club memberships and retention of them, more volunteers and coaches being enlisted, plus a rise in championship entries, and we can see very encouraging momentum being generated, and healthier roots.
There were 1097 entries for last weekend's age group championships at the Emirates - almost double the number just three years ago when it was staged at the Kelvin Hall for the last time. But perhaps the most remarkable statistic concerns this weekend's national cross-country championships at Falkirk's Callendar Park. The entry there sits at exactly 25% of that for the English national in London the same weekend. The total Scottish cross-country entry of 2213 is the biggest for 21 years (23% up in just four years) while the women's (331) is the largest ever.
Outdoor UK championships
2010 6 medals
2011 10 medals
2012 9 medals
2013 14 medals
2014 10 medals
Indoor UK championships
2011 3 medals
2012 3 medals
2013 9 medals
2014 8 medals
2015 8 medals
We have already remarked on Kirsten McAslan beating Lynsey Macdonald's 33-year-old senior 600m mark. McAslan goes from strength to strength, taking the UK 400m title on Sunday - one of four secured by Scots in an hour - along with Guy Learmonth, Laura Muir, and Allan Smith.
But another Macdonald record has since fallen: Sarah Eunson of Giffnock North claimed the under-17 800m mark while still aged 15. Macdonald set this in March 1980, four months before winning Olympic relay bronze in Moscow. Eunson has lowered her best by more than 10 seconds during the current indoor season.
At this month's Scottish Schools Indoor Championships (1300 entries), Banchory's Alisha Rees claimed the girls' over-16 200m title by almost a second, trimming 0.03 from Dawn Flockhart's 32-year-old national under-17 record of 24.81 - and the winner of the under-15 200m title, Lauren Greig, won that with a time which bettered Rees performances a year earlier.
Macdonald's 35-year-old Scottish under-17 60m best is also under threat from Rees - just 0.03 away from the time of 7.58sec which the Fife prodigy set in January 1980.
Is it too much to hope that the increase in endurance numbers will eventually translate into an across-the-board rise in quality of performance? Cross-country is the backbone of winter training for every event from 800m to the marathon. The decline in the depth of quality endurance performances in all events matches the decline in the depth and intensity of cross-country competition.
In 1987, last year that the four home nations contested the world cross-country (it's been GB ever since) 48 men (11 Scots) broke 2:20 for the marathon. Last year 17 men broke 2:20 (two Scots). In 1987, at 5000m, 15 men broke 13:40 (one Scot); last year six did so (one Scot). And at 800m in 1987 14 men (one Scot) broke 1:47; last year just four men (one Scot) broke 1:47.
Increasing participation, but also the quality of it, is the key to raising standards. Achieving that will be a real measure of legacy success.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article