RICKY BURNS, the World Boxing Organisation lightweight champion from Coatbridge, will not make a third defence of his title in London this weekend after all, having withdrawn from the bill at the ExCel Arena.
The promoter Frank Warren refused last night to confirm the sensational development, having claimed in an earlier statement that 29-year-old Burns would definitely contest the main fight on the bill.
He added that every effort was being made to find a replacement for Jose Ocampo, the 23-year-old Filipino who withdrew on Monday, having himself been brought in to replace the Englishman Liam Walsh, injured in a car crash.
When it became increasingly clear that a replacement would not be found in time, Burns was told that he would most likely fight a 10-round international contest instead. That seems to have been the final straw for the boxer after he had psyched himself up for his eighth world title contest during six weeks of hard training.
Incredibly, Warren still refused to confirm the latest developments last night. Instead, a spokesman for the promoter revealed that a statement will be issued today.
Herald Sport can confirm that Burns will return to the ring on January 26 when he will defend his crown, almost certainly in Glasgow.
Burns will take a week off to recover from his disappointment before resuming training over the festive period to ensure he is in peak condition for his delayed ring return in seven week time.
Alex Morrison, Burns' manager, said: "Ricky has the mental toughness to deal with most situations, no matter how unsettling it is for him, and he will take this in his stride. Once he digests a situation and thinks it through for a few minutes, he ends up adopting a philosophical approach.
"I feel sorry for him all the same after all the hard training he has put in over the past couple of months."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article