IT'S only when you try to follow the never-ending maze of events at Rangers that I'm eternally grateful that at Ross County myself and Jim McIntyre just have one up-front businessman of Roy MacGregor's standards to deal with.
How many different top men, chairmen, CEOs, directors, whatever, has Ally McCoist had to go cap in hand to over the last two- and-half years at Ibrox?
Most people would love to be the Rangers manager, but I don't think anybody has had to deal with so many chief executives and investors in such a short period of time.
Now it is Mike Ashley who is calling the shots, with the club requiring an additional £8 million just to see out the season. Everybody hopes the Newcastle owner is the man to finally stabilise the club, but the situation is complicated, as the SFA's rules on dual ownership mean he cannot expand his shareholding beyond its current 9% and may have to fund the club with loans instead.
There are also issues if both Newcastle and Rangers qualify for Uefa competitions, while he could use the threat of administration to drive a hard bargain. It wouldn't surprise me in the slightest if Ashley effectively owns some of the club's assets already.
Obviously the more successful Rangers become the more it helps Ashley with the merchandising side of things. But hundreds of thousands of people buy their kids Rangers strips regardless of how well the team are doing.
McCoist's focus, though, remains firmly on the football. Every week has been huge for Rangers since he took over as manager. But they don't get much bigger than this week. If ever a manager needs his players it is now.
They face Kilmarnock in the Scottish Cup today and that is folllowed on Wednesday with the Petrofac Training Cup semi-final clash against Alloa. And he needs his players to stand up and handle these occasions.
He needed them last week at Tynecastle as well, though, and let's be honest, their discipline let them down.
They were right in that game and playing quite well but the sending off turned the game. Only the players can explain it, because they are all experienced.
Of course Rangers are capable of overcoming the nine-point gap on Hearts. The flipside, though, is I am not so sure that Rangers are capable of winning each week, or that Hearts are suddenly going to start losing.
McCoist doesn't need me to tell him he is under pressure. We are all under pressure. For me Rangers need natural width in the team. McCoist knows that too, but the players who offer him that, guys like David Templeton and Fraser Aird, haven't been consistent so he can't trust them.
He must also know that he has a team full of players who have been great servants but who are coming to the end of their careers, and it looks like they are struggling to find the energy week in, week out.
That is why McCoist was down south last week looking at potential loan signings. January is looming and of course you don't want to sell a guy like Lewis Macleod, but if it comes to it and it keeps the club afloat then of course you are going to have to.
Everything would be forgotten about, though, if Rangers get up through the play-offs. With the likelihood of meeting a resurgent Hibs team, then a list of Premiership sides which could include ourselves at Ross County, there are no guarantees about that.
But with where they are just now, I think 99% of Rangers fans would take that. Right now most are fearing they might have to spend another year in the Championship.
Just to top it all, I read last week that Mark Wotte could be coming in as a director of football. While the structure of the club is something they will need to look at in time, I think most Rangers fans would agree that appointing someone like Wotte is near the bottom of a very long list of priorities.
FINALLY, I would just like to add my tribute to much-loved commentator Arthur Montford, who passed away last week. I used to love listening to him when I was growing up and I regard him, Archie MacPherson, David Francey and David Begg as the top four commentators of all time.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article