THE days stretch long for a hack at Wimbers but there was always time for a pit stop.
In my case, this normally involved stealing the hubcaps from the Bentleys in Church Road.
This nod towards Possil was normally followed by a refill at the media restaurant. Once ensconced in front of un poisson avec les pommes frites et strawberries brulee there was not much that could drag me away.
However, there were two events that would set me racing like a greyhound that has just spotted a screening of Roger Rabbit.
If Roger Federer or Andy Roddick was announced as heading for a press conference, I was on my bike so quick the stewards could not complain about me bringing it into the restaurant.
Federer has two routines. The winning press conference when he tries but fails to be humble and the losing press conference when he tries but fails to praise his opponent. This is not a criticism, merely an observation that when one is that great then it comes with more baggage than David Livingstone and his pals carried down the Zambezi.
Roddick was different. He comes from Omaha, Nebraska, which might not be Nowhere but is so close to it a taxi driver will refuse the fare and advise you to walk. If Roddick was in the room, then I careered in with enthusiasm. And, of course, with the remains of a fish supper on my coupon.
He could be funny, direct, rude, off-hand, focused, serious and downright dismissive. All in about 10 questions. He was always liable to stand up and leave when a silly question was directed his way. Being Wimbledon, this could happen with a weary regularity.
But Roddick brought mischief, humour and insight to his media duties and I loved him for it. His character had a lightness but one suspected there was always a shadow that occasionally dimmed his outlook.
There is no chance of a queue forming outside Wimbledon to feel sorry for a grand slam winner who earned $20m in prize money and married a Sports Illustrated swimsuit model. But Roddick had his troubles and they generally came in the shape of Federer.
Once asked pre-tournament about his chances of lifting the title, Roddick answered: "As good as anybody not named Roger."
His grand slam haul was restricted to one US Open largely because of the brilliance of Federer.
Roddick reached three Wimbledon finals and Roger did him in each. The most brutal was in 2009 . In five sets, in four hours 17 minutes, Roddick lost his serve once. In the last game.
Once asked what his favourite word was, the American replied: "The F word, because it's a noun, adjective and a verb."
The Federer word was more of a curse on Roddick. He has said that if he could edit his past he would change one thing: "I would have loved to have won Wimbledon."
To have come so close to realising that ambition must gnaw at him. In 2009, a missed backhand volley at the net probably cost him the title. The subsequent remoteness of challenging in grand slams possibly hastened his retirement.
At 32, he is a year younger than Fed. Roddick, though, is the commentary box at Wimbledon for the BBC while Federer seeks to add to his record haul of majors.
Roddick brings wit, technical knowledge and experience to his new role. He is sharp, too, on character and he will be a media sensation if he can keep to his professed ambition and his past performance of being honest in assessing those he once played against.
This is the most difficult task for the reasonable human being. One has to be critical of those who one likes, even respects. Roddick's views are likely to be leavened by the experience of having been there and not quite having done it at Wimbledon.
There will be understanding, perhaps even compassion, for those who come up short. But I cannot wait for him to commentate on a Federer match. The Greatest Player of All Time is on a campaign to win an eighth Wimbledon title.
There are those who believe that Federer, who will be 34 next month, is tilting at windmills with a strand of cooked spaghetti. It is three years since he won a grand slam and the list of those who have beaten him in majors since includes names that are far from illustrious such as Sergiy Stakhovsky and Andreas Seppi. These are both good players but once they would not have laid a glove on Fed. The great Swiss player has proved he can still win tournaments but can he win a slam when seven opponents have to be defeated in two weeks?
Recent evidence suggests not and Roddick just may have to compose a eulogy for the death of a Federer dream. Whatever happens, Federer still has the capacity to be the story at Wimbledon. Roddick, in contrast, can merely supply some words.
He could be forgiven for reflecting on what might have been if a backhand volley had been made or if a young Swiss boy had stuck to football.
What has made Federer great has added to Roddick's humanity. The American will have his views on the balance of that deal.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article