EVEN in victory there was agitation between Rafael Benitez and Chelsea, writes Ben Rumsby.
The interim manager has not proven a popular appointment among supporters but yesterday it was the Spaniard who was perturbed. Chelsea eased through to the final of the World Club Cup with a win over Monterrey but there were still elements of the performance which are in need of attention.
Juan Mata, Fernando Torres – who scored in his third consecutive match for Chelsea – and an own goal from Darvin Chavez decided the match and set up a final with Corinthians on Sunday. The Chelsea squad seemed jaded after making the journey to Yokohama and conceded in stoppage time as Aldo de Negris scored a consolation for the Mexicans.
Benitez, who won the tournament with Internazionale two years ago has little time for excuses afterwards, though. "I'm not very happy with the goal we conceded," he said. "We won, which is fine, but still these little things can make a difference in a final, for example. When I talk about a winning mentality, always I talk about little details making the difference. They have to keep their concentration to the end."
Chelsea spurned a hatful of chances in the first half before Mata gave the London side the lead. A three-minute blitz then followed after the break as Torres continued his scoring form. Chelsea have now won three matches on the spin, with the Spanish striker finding the net in each of them. It is the first time he has managed such a feat since joining the club.
"He's a bit sharper, has more confidence and the team's playing well," said Benitez. "It's a run, and that's good for him and good for us. If we continue creating chances, he'll carry on scoring."
The result will not cause many ripples given the disparity between the two sides and Victor Vucetich, the Monterrey manager, was philosophical afterwards. "The players are getting paid a lot, so that's how they get great players," he said.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article