HEARTS were yesterday informed that Danny Wilson will be permitted to remain with the club next season.
The defender's loan agreement from Liverpool expired at midnight last night and, with Hearts under a transfer embargo as a result of going into administration, it was thought Wilson would not be able to finalise the three-year contract he agreed with the Tynecastle club earlier in the month.
The Scottish Professional Football League, however, have decreed the deal constituted a contract extension, rather than a registration, and therefore did not break the terms of the embargo. The 21-year-old has taken a pay cut – thought to be in the region of 50%, as several other members of the Hearts squad have already done – to remain at the club.
With Hearts' administrators BDO having made redundant 14 non- playing staff, as well as striker John Sutton who elected not to take a pay cut, the recruitment of Wilson may generate some controversy but Gary Locke, the Hearts manager, felt it was the right move for the club and the player. "The administration has made no difference to his status," Locke said of a player who also spent time on loan at Blackpool and Bristol City before arriving at Tynecastle in January.
"I appreciate there have been some difficult decisions made regarding player redundancies. But given that Danny has agreed to a wage cut and is happy to be playing for Hearts, this gives us an opportunity to improve the team, so why wouldn't we jump at the chance to have him in our side?"
A statement from the SPFL, the governing body created by the merger of the Scottish Premier League and the Scottish Football League, read: "The SPFL player registration of Hearts player Danny Wilson would, had he not agreed a contract extension, have terminated on 30 June. The SPFL has now received documents extending the contract of the player.
"As a result, the player's existing SPFL registration is automatically extended and is not affected by the embargo on new SPFL player registrations currently in place on Heart of Midlothian FC as a result of Heart of Midlothian plc (in administration) being in administration."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article