STUART McCALL has accused Motherwell of putting another dent in Scottish football's image after slashing Rangers' ticket allocation for Sunday's SPFL Premiership play-off final second leg.
The Lanarkshire club believed they would be allowed to take 2,000 fans to Thursday night's Ibrox opener, but were then informed they can bring just 950.
As a result, Fir Park officials, who were ready to hand Gers the entire 4,800-capacity South Stand, responded by cutting the Championship side's allocation to 1,500.
The row follows a similar disagreement involving Rangers and Hibernian during last week's semi-final clashes.
McCall, who comes up against his old side for the first time since leaving the manager's office at Motherwell last November ,can understand why the Steelmen will not want to allow a sizeable Light Blues following to cheer on their team in what could be a decisive clash as they look to end their three-year exile in the lower leagues.
However, he claims it is another missed opportunity to showcase our the Scottish game in the best possible light.
"I'm disappointed, naturally, because I know that Rangers fans will make themselves heard," he said. "We get great backing.
"From a manager's point of view, the fewer number of away fans in your ground the better.
"But from a bigger perspective, it was disappointing to see a lot of empty seats at Easter Road and it will be disappointing to see it at Fir Park.
"I don't know the ins and outs behind this decision, but it's not great. Ibrox is sold-out, so that's what that is, but Fir Park won't be anywhere near it.
"I saw [Motherwell general manager] Alan Burrows being quoted saying he'd like the rules looked at so there are percentages [of tickets allocated to visiting clubs], but this will be the last game in British football this season on Sunday and I'm sure there will be a big audience. It will look poor when the camera pans in behind one goal and there are empty seats."
Rangers have held their nerve against second-tier rivals Queen of the South and Hibs to set up this two-legged shoot-out with the Premiership's second-bottom side, but it leaves boss McCall with an emotional dilemma as he faces the prospect of relegating a club he still holds dear to his heart.
"Since I've had a pair of football boots at four years old, I've always wanted to win," the 50-year-old said. "My kids will tell you that I've left them in tears at times after beating them at Monopoly.
"It's how I am. Just like Keith Lasley, Stevie Hammell and the rest will be wanting to win for Motherwell, it's in me to do the same.
"Football can be ruthless, but this is just the way it has turned out.
"I'm quite a loyal person and I had almost four brilliant years at Motherwell. but my thoughts on that and what comes next for them will only come after Sunday's match.
"I'm fully focused on doing the job I came here to do. Rangers are my club and we want to get promoted."
McCall led Motherwell to third place in his first year in charge at Fir Park before making the most of Rangers' absence to claim back-to-back runners-up slots, but he walked away earlier this season after mustering just two wins from his side's first 12 games.
He admits he will stand jointly responsible should the Lanarkshire club suffer relegation.
"I've got to take a share of the blame for what has happened," he said. "I never once envisioned Motherwell would be anywhere near the bottom. The reason I left was that, after finishing best of the rest three years running, we had a poor start after getting a lot of injuries and I could only see us fighting for that sixth spot.
"I felt that would be a challenge that I just didn't have in me any more. I didn't have the energy or drive any more, so I thought it would be better to let someone come in and refresh the place."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article