Hearts have warned that Scottish football is in "real danger of speeding up the demise of the game" if reconstruction plans are not voted through next week.
The Edinburgh club, who only avoided being wound up before Christmas because of a £1million-plus cash input from supporters, today outlined their reasons for supporting plans for a merged league structure with more equitable distribution of wealth.
Hearts believe the mid-season split, which will see two top leagues of 12 divide into three, will provide "increased competition amongst the top 24 professional clubs in Scotland with almost every game at every stage in the season having value to spectators, broadcasters and sponsors".
In a 3,300-word statement on their website, the club added: "The new proposed league will allow the game to benefit from potential new revenues that do not currently exist.
"This in turn provides valuable additional income that is distributed amongst the clubs.
"This is guaranteed income which is crucial for clubs when predicting cash flow projections for the new season."
St Mirren have announced their intention to vote against the plan and Ross County had previously expressed their opposition, although they have yet to reaffirm their final position.
Only two of the 12 Scottish Premier League clubs need to veto the proposals on Monday before they can go to the Scottish Football League, but Hearts warned of the consequences of blocking change.
"Crowds are dropping at games, audience figures are dropping with broadcasters and commercial income is dropping as a result of both these factors," they said.
"Quality on the pitch is being affected by the pressure on clubs' revenues and we are in real danger of speeding up the demise of the game if we don't change to the new model."
The model has been several years in the making with previous ideas failing to achieve the consensus that the SPL appeared to have in January.
Hearts said: "It's true, though, there is a greater risk of relegation for every club in the current SPL with, being realistic, the exception of Celtic.
"This, together with the acceptance to redistribute base income across 24 clubs as opposed to 12, shows just how seriously SPL clubs view the need to change the game as a whole for the betterment of Scottish football.
"The top two positions alone in the current SPL will give up £1 million in prize money in order to facilitate a new 24-team professional league in Scotland."
Surveys have shown fans want bigger leagues but Hearts estimated they would lose £1million in gate money alone if a 16-team top flight was introduced.
They added: "Structures with a smaller number of clubs have proved to be undeliverable (i.e. the clubs will not vote in sufficient numbers to reduce their number).
"Additionally, this would not be of interest to supporters who would rather see more games against different clubs if possible.
"Structures with a larger number of clubs do not provide the required number of league matches (i.e. there are too few league matches), do not deliver improved commercial opportunities, can lead to more meaningless (and therefore less attractive to fans) matches and would have a negative impact on the revenues of clubs from both match day and central sources."
And, addressing the fact that Austria and Switzerland dropped a similar system, Hearts said: "Both countries ran with similar league systems for a number of years and, whilst the format proved to be very exciting and competitive, they have now changed to smaller ten-team top divisions for other reasons.
"Different leagues face different challenges, and the 12/12 structure has been designed to address the specific challenges faced currently by Scottish football."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article