DURING a high-profile court case Shota Arveladze's lawyer revealed Rangers actually paid £8.5million for the Georgian striker when they signed him in 2001 - which staggeringly is more than four times the publicised fee.
The former Ibrox hero, who is now a manager, won a legal action this week against his former club Ajax from a dispute dating back 18 years. The Amsterdam side claimed Arveladze owed them £855,000 over his transfer from Dinamo Tbilisi in 1997.
The dispute was over whether the player's share of the deal was included as part of his gross or net salary and the Dutch club took the matter to court to sue their former player after years of claims and counter-claims.
Dutch courts ruled in Arveladze's favour this week and ordered the Amsterdam outfit to pay all the 42-year-old's legal costs.
His lawyer, Rob Cohen, made the astonishing claim that Ajax were actually paid 12 million Euros - around £8.5m - by the then big-spending Ibrox side to sign the player when Dick Advocaat was in charge, despite a fee of just £2m being widely reported at the time.
Cohen said: "We have fought long and hard for this, but finally won. There is a party atmosphere at the Arveladze family home. Ajax must take a good look in the mirror.
"They received 12 million Euros from Glasgow Rangers for Shota and he did not deserve this outrageous treatment.
"They are all cowards. Edwin Van der Sar, Marc Overmars, the old and the new management. They all knew they were wrong and refused to comment."
Arveladze managed in Turkey until this year when he left his last job as boss of Kasimpasa.
He was part of the Rangers squad that won the treble in 2002-03 and the double in 2004-05.
If Rangers did pay that enormous fee, it would make Arveladze the second-most expensive import in Scottish football history, behind the £12m the Ibrox side infamously paid for Tore Andre Flo from Chelsea.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article