HOUSING chiefs sought to use legal powers against residents unwilling to evacuate their homes to accommodate the axed Commonwealth Games opening ceremony plans, it has emerged.
New details secured under freedom of information (FOI) legislation show that agencies involved in the proposed demolition of Glasgow's Red Road flats were aware of how logistically fraught and controversial the plans were.
Correspondence reveals how the plans were kept secret from board members of Glasgow Housing Association (GHA), how authorities used the figure of 1875 people affected by the plans and not the 887 households used in public announcements and the reasons provided for not giving local residents tickets for the opening ceremony at Celtic Park.
It also emerged yesterday that senior police officers were concerned the plans could create a huge dust cloud affecting aviation airspace, would also divert resources away from the Games area and have a significant impact on public transport.
Correspondence shows one senior officer claiming closure of a nearby railway line could hinder an emergency evacuation from Celtic Park and raised the issue of the cost of additional policing.
The 1960s high-rises in the north-east of Glasgow were due to be demolished as the curtain raiser to the July 23 opening ceremony, in what was supposed to signify the ongoing regeneration of Glasgow.
But a combination of a public backlash and safety fears that the site might be hijacked by protesters led to the demolition of five of the six blocks being cancelled.
Emails show that GHA, which owns the flats, had asked the city council about using statutory powers if residents did not leave.
An email from a senior council officer states: "It was put forward that their intention is for us to assist with the removal of occupants of adjacent buildings on the day of the explosive demolition who could not be persuaded to remove by voluntary means. This would be on the basis that the buildings could be considered to be in a dangerous condition."
But it adds that the flats would not have been considered dangerous and that although GHA wanted to revisit the issue, the officer "saw no scope for changing my opinion".
Correspondence from GHA to Glasgow 2014 board member Bridget McConnell and city council chief executive George Black and dated from March 24 - 10 days before the plans were publicly announced - shows how the agency was keeping its own board, which includes tenants and councillors, in the dark over the plans.
The email states: "We will pull the Red Road demolition presentation from the GHA board agenda for this Friday.
"When the date for the press briefing is pinned down for next week we will arrange to brief our board members on the day, either face to face or on a call/email."
Regarding plans for decanted residents, a Glasgow 2014 Organising Committee official told Mrs McConnell and Mr Black the transportation of nearly 2000 residents would be a headache, adding: "The OC and the council regularly receive requests for various forms of compensation for displaced residents and businesses.
"Free tickets are the most common form of compensation and to date all such requests have been declined. Should we progress with the option of tickets to the ceremony we will need to consider carefully the knock-on risk to the OC and the council that may stem from apparent inconsistency."
A GHA spokesman said: "We were simply exploring all options around all aspects of this demolition as we do in every case."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article