MANY UK children lack a modern understanding of the Commonwealth, seeing it simply as the "former British Empire", it has been suggested.
A new survey reveals that youngsters from other Commonwealth countries have a better knowledge of the international network.
In total, just over half (57%) of UK seven to 14-year-olds said they knew that the Commonwealth is a voluntary association of 53 independent countries, compared to nearly eight in 10 (78%) of those living in other Commonwealth nations.
And whilst 93% of those from other Commonwealth countries said that they were proud to be part of the the network, less than two thirds (61%) of those living in the UK said the same.
The survey, published by the British Council, comes as the Commonwealth Games is due to begin in Glasgow.
The findings show that children have different attitudes towards the international association.
Asked what the Commonwealth means to them, the most popular answer among UK schoolchildren was "former British Empire" (33%), whereas for other youngsters it was "shared language, culture and history" (24%).
Fewer than half (45%) of UK youngsters said that they will be watching the Glasgow games, compared to 82% of those living in other Commonwealth countries.
British Council UK regional director Julia Amour said: "A third of the world's population live in Commonwealth countries, and it's clear that many of the Commonwealth's next generation feel that it still plays an important role in forging cultural understanding and building trust between people around the world.
"However, it's alarming that twice as many children in the UK compared to the rest of the Commonwealth see the network as the former British Empire, considering they were born in a different century to the Empire. We need our children to see the world as it is, not just as it was."
The online survey questioned 1,157 children aged seven to 14, including 357 from the UK, in June.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article