RICKY BURNS will take to the ring for the 50th professional bout of his career this evening, but the 35-year-old has insisted that he is far from finished as a boxer.
Burns will take on Ivan Niegac in Newcastle and while the Coatbridge man, who became a three-weight world champion over the course of his seventeen year career, is not fighting for global titles anymore, he insists that he is not quite ready to hang up the gloves.
“The Ricky Burns story is not finished just yet,” Burns told Sky Sports.
“I’ve got no regrets in my career, I’ve lived it. I’m proud to say I’m a three-weight world champion and still think there’s a couple of big fights in me.
“That being said, I have a job to do tonight for those opportunities to come to fruition. I’ve never boxed in Newcastle before so am looking forward to the atmosphere.”
Burns may have been usurped by Josh Taylor as Scotland’s pre-eminent active boxer but an impressive performance in his last outing, which saw him lose only narrowly to Anthony Crolla on points last October, means Burns is be keen to have another shot at the Englishman.
““I’d love to get the Crolla rematch,” he said.
“I’ve watched our first fight back a couple of times and I think it was a draw in all honesty. Whether it can be made or not is another matter. He needs to get his finger out.”
Burns may have established himself as one of Scotland’s greatest-ever fighters with his win over Michele Di Rocco to become this country’s first-ever three-weight world champion but back-to-back defeats in 2017, to Julius Indongo and then Crolla, resulted in many observers suggesting that Burns should call it a day. But his win against Di Rocco, which many people doubted would happen, proved, insists Burns, that he can pick up victories when it is least expected.
“We made history with the Di Rocco win,” Burns said.
“I wasn’t to be denied on that night. People were writing me off, saying I should retire but again I showed people otherwise. The scenes that followed will stay with me for a while and it was a proud moment.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here