NEIL LENNON believes the disdain showed towards Scottish football ultimately cost Liverpool £75 million as the former Celtic manager described the decision to overlook Virgil van Dijk for so long as embarrassing.
The 46-year has revealed how he was regularly inundated with enquiries about the Dutchman, who starred at Parkhead between 2013 and 2015, following his arrival from Dutch side Groningen.
Despite Lennon offering an honest assessment of a ‘Rolls-Royce defender’, there was a reluctance to offer up what was seen as a reasonable transfer fee, which he puts down to a foolish attitude towards the quality of players north of the border.
Read more: Murdo MacLeod: Celtic have managed transfer market better than any club in Britain
Southampton did ultimately stump up a £12 million for Van Dijk and he has not looked back.
In January he became the most expensive defender of all time when he joined Liverpool, was recently named captain of the Netherlands and on Saturday will line up in the Champions League final in Kiev against Real Madrid.
And Lennon still laughs when he considers how long it took for England to wake up to the talent from just across Hadrian’s Wall.
“I thought he would have been snapped up from Celtic well before he was,” said Lennon. “The fact that he played in Scotland maybe slowed the process down a little bit. A lot of scouts and managers should be hanging their heads.
“It’s embarrassing. I got calls from big clubs about Van Dijk on a number of occasions. I just could not believe what they were waiting for. Southampton did the right thing. They came in and did the business and it was an absolute no-brainer.
Read more: Martin Skrtel won't be joining former Liverpool team-mate Steven Gerrard at Rangers
“I’m telling you. Big club scouts rang me and I said ‘what are you thinking about?’ ‘What are you waiting for?’ Some of the answers I got back were absolutely baffling.
“Because of this ‘playing in Scotland’ nonsense, there was this ‘is he good enough for the English Premier League?’ question hanging over him. They used to cast doubt over Henrik Larsson too, and he went to Barcelona.
“Maybe their perception of the Scottish game has cost them. It has cost Liverpool a lot of money but, in the end, it’s probably money well spent. He has made Liverpool better. I think he has been the missing link really.
“But, they could have had him for £10 to 12 million two or three years ago if they had done their jobs properly.”
While Van Dijk’s aptitude to the Premier League may have take some by surprise when he joined Southampton, Lennon expected nothing less.
Now Hibernian head coach, and busy trying to unearth more gems for the Easter Road outfit, he recalls being dazzled by the towering, raw defender in a fixture against Ajax - only for Van Dijk to cost his side a goal.
Nevertheless, he already had his chequebook out to finalise ‘the steal of the century’.
“I went over to watch him against Ajax - and he made a mistake,” smiled Lennon “But you only needed to watch 10 minutes and you just knew. People say he’s got better - well, I can tell you, he was like that when he was 22.
“It was a no-brainer. Honestly, he was one of the steals of the century. I don’t know why other clubs weren’t scrambling to sign him.
“We had seen plenty of footage of him with Groningen and you’re watching and going ‘wow, is this boy available?’ There has to be something wrong with him. He must have one eye or something.
“He has a fantastic temperament, great physique and is technically unbelievable. He was just a Rolls-Royce. He could go through the gears when he wanted to.
“When I saw him playing for Groningen, he used to bring the ball out of defence, hit a pass 40-50 yards on a six-pence to the winger. I thought ‘there must be English Premiership scouts watching this guy’. In the end, we got him for just over two million euros. I couldn’t believe my luck.
“On the first day when we got him into training I said ‘look, enjoy yourself here, you’ll not be here long!’ He was just that good.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel