THEY say you should never go back, particularly to a place you didn’t exactly leave on the best of terms.
But you sense that a part of former Rangers attacker Steven Naismith never really left Ibrox, as he explained yesterday that a move back to the team he supports appeals to him, and that he would still have a lot to offer his old club if they made a move for him.
Naismith has been a bit-part player at current club Norwich City this season, making just three top-team appearances in a campaign disrupted by injury. Now back fighting fit though, Naismith says he feels better than ever, and that he would love to come back to play in Scotland.
The 31-year-old still has a year-and-a-half left on the lucrative deal he signed at Carrow Road after joining from Everton for £11million almost two years ago, but he admitted that first-team football is now his main priority when asked if a move back to Rangers would appeal.
“I think it would,” said Naismith. “I’ve spoken in the past about Kilmarnock and Rangers and being appreciative for what they did for me as a player. I would look at those clubs and see if they were options to start with.
“I wouldn’t say [I had] unfinished business [at Rangers], because we were successful and won a lot of trophies.
“The way I left wasn’t great. I still watch all the games on TV, still speak to all the players and staff I know at the club. I love hearing how things are going. I still support Rangers and I want them to do well.
“Moving forward, coming back to Scotland there would be clubs I’d prefer to play with rather than just coming back and picking and choosing whoever. Fortunately, when I come back to Scotland, it’s not going to be about finances. It’ll be about what I think is the right fit for me. That’ll be the main thing.
“You need people at the clubs to want you and you just need to see what options are available.
“The biggest things for me going to any club would be: will I play, will I bring something to the club and can I help the youngsters who are there?
“Also, a team that competes. In Scotland, outwith the teams that will challenge, the rest are mixed. One season Kilmarnock can be struggling for relegation now they’re where they are.
“It’s more what I can bring to the club, if it’s the right fit and if I believe what they’re going forwards with.
“I think I could go anywhere and make a difference.”
Naismith does have a link to current Rangers interim manager Graeme Murty, with the pair working together at Norwich before Murty made the switch north.
While having great respect for his former colleague as a coach, and lauding the job he is doing in trying circumstances, he thinks that it is important for the Rangers board to take their time and make sure they get their next permanent managerial appointment spot on, whether that means Murty taking charge or someone else.
“It’s hard for Murts,” he said. “He was at Norwich before, so I’ve had some dealings with Murts, and he is a great coach. It’s a very difficult situation for him.
“He’s done great in terms of dealing with it all, and it’s hard for everyone involved.
“I think they need to make the right appointment, and when that time is right, they will make it. That’s all they can do, it’s not for me to say he should get it until the end of the season.
“The club just needs to move forward, and whatever way forward that is, whether it’s with him in charge or if they find a suitable candidate to take over.”
Naismith has been impressed by some of what he has seen from Rangers under Murty’s charge recently, but he thinks they are lacking the sort of leadership on the field that they had when he was at the club to drag them through games they are expected to win.
The loss to St Johnstone on Saturday was their fourth home defeat of the campaign, and Naismith reckons that they need players who have the mentality to stand up to the demands of a packed, expectant Ibrox.
“In some parts you watch them, and you think that they have been really good,” he said. “The Hearts game, the two Aberdeen games, those are tough, tough games and they came through them and showed a resilience.
“But I remember when I was there, guys like Barry Ferguson, Davie Weir, even Durranty [Ian Durrant] and John Brown would be telling us that those aren’t the games that win you titles.
“It’s the home games where everyone expects you to batter teams and win that are the toughest, and dealing with the crowd when things aren’t going well. That’s what they are really lacking at the moment, having that knowledge of how to see out a game at home.
“At any team that is challenging, a demanding crowd is the norm. When I was at Everton and we played against teams you were expected to beat, if it was half-time and you hadn’t really created a chance, then the fans weren’t happy.
“That’s football, but you need to understand what the game-plan is, and you need to understand that sustaining attacks is the one thing that is crucial when any team is on top. Sometimes that’s what wins you games, that sustained attack, because you know somebody will eventually switch off.
“In the team that I was in at Rangers, Steven Davis was brilliant at it, knowing when to pick the right pass, when to force a pass or just keep the opponent in their own half.
“Barry Ferguson when I first went there, the amount of games that he dragged us through was unbelievable. It’s having that, not just having great feet or unbelievable delivery or anything like that.
“You’re there for a reason, you’ve got good ability, it’s the other side of it.”
*Steven was speaking as he backed Loaves & Fishes, a charity working in Glasgow, North and South Lanarkshire to provide meals, food parcels, clothes and toiletries for those in need.
For more information, to make a donation or to volunteer with Loaves & Fishes please visit www.loavesandfishes.org.uk.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel