THE pro-Union arguments used by Better Together to persuade Scots to remain part of the UK should be used as a blueprint for Europhile politicians if Britons have the chance to vote in a referendum on European Union membership, Lord Robertson has said.
The former Labour Cabinet minister, now known as Lord Robertson of Port Ellen, warned that leaving the EU would be disastrous for Britain.
He said all the arguments deployed in the Better Together campaign to retain the Union with Scotland applied to the EU and should be reformulated for a debate on EU membership.
If the arguments were put cogently and a referendum on EU membership was held, said Lord Robertson, the British people would "reach the same conclusion as the Scots" and vote to retain the existing relationship with the EU.
His comments came during a debate in the House of Lords last night.
Prime Minister David Cameron has promised UK voters an "in-out" referendum on the EU if the Conservatives form a majority government after next year's General Election.
Labour's spokesman on Europe, Lord Liddle, said: "Britain is sleepwalking towards exit. The blame rests fairly and squarely on the shoulders of the Prime Minister. I've come to the sad and rather depressing conclusion that our membership of the EU is no longer safe in David Cameron's hands."
Lord Liddle said the Government's European policy had "hardened beyond recognition" since the summer and accused Mr Cameron of being prepared to say anything to win over potential Ukip voters.
Ukip now has two MPs at Westminster as a result of by-elections sparked when former Conservative MPs defected.
Lord Liddle warned that quitting the EU would leave Britain isolated, with "untold consequences" for jobs.
Tory former foreign office minister Lord Howell of Guildford insisted there was an appetite for reform across the EU and denied that Britain was a lone voice for change.
He said treaty change was inevitable.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article