LOCAL government spending cuts are creating a more divided society by leaving councils in the poorest parts of Scotland around £100 worse off per person than the richest, research has found.
According to the Joseph Rowntree Foundation (JRF) report, the west of Scotland is suffering more than the east.
Local government spending is set to fall by 24% in Scotland, with warnings that cash-strapped councils will end up serving only the neediest fraction of the population while wider services are cut.
The JRF report, 'Coping With Cuts? Local Government And Poorer Communities', said there was also a danger of increased social division, with resentment growing amongst the better-off for paying for services which do not benefit them and which are used almost exclusively by poorer citizens.
John Low, JRF policy and research manager, said: "It is clear the cuts are biting deep into the poorest and most deprived communities.
"Unless we can muster the national will to correct or mitigate the unacceptable divergence of resources between more and less affluent authorities, we are slowly but inexorably creating a more divided society."
Researchers analysed the scale and pattern of spending cuts in Scottish and English local government since the Westminster Coalition took power in 2010. The study found attempts had been made to protect services used by the public, with most of the budget cuts made through back office costs.
But areas where savings can be made across local government are "rapidly diminishing" and people will be expected to do more for themselves, such as running leisure centres, caring for elderly neighbours and picking up litter, the report said.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article