David Miliband has delivered a scathing critique of Labour under his brother's leadership, dismissing it as backward-looking and out of touch.
The former foreign secretary gave his frankest response yet to the devastating election defeat as the party's MPs started to nominate potential successors to Ed Miliband.
Frontrunners Andy Burnham, Yvette Cooper and Liz Kendall have already achieved the 35 backers required to make the final ballot. Left-winger Jeremy Corbyn - with 11 - and shadow international development secretary Mary Creagh - with five - still have work to do before nominations close on June 15.
Mr Burnham, Ms Cooper and Ms Kendall were jeered by union activists at a GMB hustings yesterday after they refused to condemn Tory plans to reduce the benefit cap to £23,000.
In an interview with CNN, Mr Miliband - who moved to New York to run the International Rescue Committee charity after narrowly losing the 2010 leadership contest to Ed - was asked how Labour could recover from its grim results.
"I think what is important for all the candidates is to reflect on the very clear lessons of two devastating electoral defeats of the Labour Party in the last five years which have come for a very clear reason," he said.
"And the reason is that the public have concluded that instead of building on the strengths and remedying the weaknesses of the Blair years the party has turned the page backwards rather than turning the page forward.
"So I think it is the responsibility of all the candidates to find again that combination of economic dynamism and social justice that defined the success of the Labour Party in the 1990s and early 2000s."
Mr Miliband pointed out that Labour was still in power in many of the country's northern cities.
"Those local government leaders are making their voice heard to a national party that needs to catch up with the way Britain has changed, the way politics has changed and the kind of agenda that needs to be set in an age of economic insecurity which is what exists across Europe at the moment," he said.
In an interview with The Times, Mr Miliband said his "worst fears were con-firmed" when the results started to come in on May 7.
He said the party's pitch had made him "very fearful of the consequences", and he felt "frustration and anger" about what a Conservative majority govern-ment would mean for Britain.
The defeat was was "doubly painful" because of his brother's involvement. "I don't want him to be hurt and I don't want him to be vilified," he said. "There is no consolation in any sense of vindication, frankly, because I care about the country and I care about the party."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article