A SURVEY that shows three out of four of Labour's General Election candidates oppose the renewal of Trident has raised SNP hopes of scrapping Britain's nuclear deterrent should the Nationalists hold the balance of power after May 7.
According to a snapshot of Labour's General Election hopefuls for CND, some 75 per cent opposed renewing Trident at a cost of £3 billion a year. Indeed, in Labour's target seats outwith the ones it already holds, opposition to the UK's nuclear deterrent rose to 80 per cent among party candidates.
The poll was described by CND as a "representative survey" but no details were given as to how many candidates were questioned.
UK Labour's official policy is to maintain the continuous at sea deterrent albeit at the cheapest price; Scottish Labour's policy is to scrap Trident. Jim Murphy, the party leader in Scotland and a former Shadow Defence Secretary, supports keeping Britain's nuclear deterrent, stressing that he is a multilateralist.
But Lou Haigh, the Labour hopeful in the safe seat of Sheffield Heeley, said: "Investment in nuclear is immoral in and of itself".
In Leeds East, fellow Labour candidate Richard Burgon, said: "Opposing the replacement of Trident is not only right as part of a practical strategy to create a safer world, it will also save the UK Government £100bn, which should be spent on hospitals, schools and job creation."
Angus Robertson, the SNP leader at Westminster, seized on the survey, claiming it suggested a "growing awareness south of the border that Scotland could well be in a powerful position in the next Westminster Parliament by electing a strong team of SNP MPs; making scrapping the renewal of Trident entirely achievable".
He argued that the poll was "hugely embarrassing" for Mr Murphy, who once again had "found himself on the same side as the Tories and against most of his fellow Westminster party candidates".
While Labour currently has a vociferous anti-nuclear faction, even among these MPs there is a feeling that scrapping Trident, were the SNP to hold the balance of power after the election, would be a step too far for Ed Miliband and his senior colleagues.
One anti-Trident Labour MP insisted the numbers to change the leadership's mind on renewal of the nuclear deterrent were simply not there. "There are the Greens, some Liberal Democrats and about 30 Labour MPs but that's not enough."
The backbencher also suggested it would be foolish of the SNP to push hard on Trident in any post-election confidence and supply talks with the Labour leadership. "Any party that chose Trident to try to blackmail or threaten Labour would be making a big mistake because they wouldn't get it."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article