THE Tory election fear strategy of talking up an alliance between Labour and the SNP "really chilled the English heart" and helped spur the Liberal Democrat crash, Nick Clegg has admitted.
The former party leader , whose party lost 49 Westminster seats, 10 in Scotland,"totally" rejected suggestions the Lib Dems did not reach out to Charles Kennedy, who died earlier this month following the loss of his Highland seat after 32 years in the House of Commons.
Mr Clegg argued on LBC radio that he had not destroyed his party and stressed he did not regret going into coalition for "one millisecond" despite the near wipe-out at the polls.
The former Deputy Prime Minister declared: "I haven't destroyed the party. Liberalism will survive; the Liberal Democrats will bounce back."
Mr Clegg explained that he would have stood last October after the disastrous European and local elections.
But he stressed: "Changing leader a year before the election wouldn't have made much difference to, for instance, whether we would have been able to withstand Scottish Nationalism north of the Border."
The ex-Deputy Prime Minister felt the Conservative strategy of talking up the prospect of Labour/SNP Government had a big effect in England.
"Ten days before the election day all of us really felt a Labour government dancing to the tune of the SNP really chilled the English heart and you could see lots of people that would traditionally have voted for the Liberal Democrats playing it safe and saying the best guarantee(against) that was to vote Conservative," he explained.
Mr Clegg said Mr Kennedy, who he kept in touch with by text, was "amazingly resilient and was already thinking about how he would play a role in the European referendum campaign."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article