The SNP will demand no further rises to the state pension age in Scotland while life expectancy lags behind the rest of the UK and Europe, First Minister Nicola Sturgeon has said.
Ms Sturgeon, who was health secretary for five years, said she has been doing all she can within her devolved powers to raise the life expectancy in Scotland, but said in the meantime older Scots should not lose out.
Polls suggest the SNP could have a significant influence in the next parliament and Ms Sturgeon said they will also call for the retention of the "triple lock" on pensions and a single-tier pension rate of at least £160 to lift pensioners out of means-tested benefits.
Ms Sturgeon said: "SNP MPs will push Westminster to retain the triple lock on pensions - meaning our older people benefit from real increases on their pensions at a time when so many people are struggling with the cost of living.
"The SNP will continue to make the case for a single-tier pension rate of at least £160 a week to ensure pensioners are no longer subjected to the scourge of means-tested benefits.
"The Tory/Lib Dem government's plan to further increase the state pension age is a worry to people across the UK who are planning for their future, but the failure to take Scotland's specific circumstances into account is particularly unfair.
"Our comparatively low life expectancy rate is an issue which I will do everything in my power to change but in the meantime it would be completely unacceptable for people in Scotland who have paid in to a state pension all of their lives to lose out.
"That is why SNP MPs will reject any plans for a further increase in the state pension age.
"Our pensioners have contributed hugely to society and are entitled to get a fair deal in their retirement in return.
"A strong team of SNP MPs holding the balance of power will ensure that the contribution older people have made throughout their lives is recognised - and will deliver a new and better deal for pensioners in Scotland."
Ms Sturgeon set out the concerns pensioners have been relaying to her as she campaigned in East Dunbartonshire.
During a visit to a care home, she said: "I think people right across Scotland, regardless of what age group or part of society they're in, are concerned about the prospect, if the Westminster parties are left to their own devices, of a further £30 billion of cuts over the next couple of years.
"The SNP are presenting an alternative to that. We don't think there should be further spending cuts, we think there should be modest spending increases that still allow us to get the deficit down, but crucially allow us to invest in infrastructure, in public services, in helping the vulnerable and making sure that our pensioners - those who've given so much to society - get decent treatment in their later years."
Scottish Labour candidate for Cumbernauld, Kilsyth and Kirkintilloch East Gregg McClymont said: "The SNP are hiding a Barnett bombshell from pensioners.
"The SNP want only Scottish taxes to support Scottish spending - that would end the UK shared pension. To pretend otherwise is simply dishonest.
"Full fiscal autonomy is the SNP's central election policy, and it would leave a £7.6 billion black hole in Scotland's finances, which is more than our entire pensions bill.
"And that's before the extra cost of Scotland's faster ageing society is factored in. This is the reality of the SNP's fantasy finance plans for Scotland.
"A UK Labour government will guarantee the Barnett formula, the UK-wide deal which means higher public spending in Scotland, and which protects Scotland's higher per head pension benefits. A Labour government is committed to the triple-lock on state pensions.
"Only Labour is big enough and strong enough to kick the Tories out. We have to stop the Tories being the largest party, but a vote for any other party simply gives the Tories a chance to cling to power."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article