An SNP MP has condemned the UK Government's decision to block publication of the controversial memo leaked by former Scottish secretary Alistair Carmichael in the run-up to the general election.
Peter Grant (Glenrothes) told MPs a freedom of information request had been rejected on the grounds its compliance would involve the release of information that "could damage" Britain's relationship with France.
He said: "The request was about the circumstances in which a then minister of the crown authorised the deliberate leaking of a confidential but probably inaccurate record of a private conversation between another minister of the crown and a senior representative of the French government.
"Could we have an urgent statement from the Secretary of State for Scotland (David Mundell) to reassure the House the Government's attitude to secrecy and open government is based on what is in the interests of the public?"
Mr Grayling insisted the Government had no particular reason to have a "vested interest" in the matter.
But he added: "It is important governments can operate in a way that is in the interests of the country."
He pointed Mr Grant to the role of the information commissioner and tribunal that enables decisions to be challenged.
Liberal Democrat Mr Carmichael (Orkney and Shetland), who has come under intense pressure to quit, denies breaking electoral law by allowing a memo to be leaked to damage SNP leader Nicola Sturgeon.
But he has admitted he made an "error of judgement on a political matter" and says he would have resigned from government had he still been a minister.
A petition was lodged at the Court of Session in Edinburgh earlier this month that seeks to oust him over the leaking of a document alleging the Scottish First Minister Ms Sturgeon wanted David Cameron to remain as prime minister.
Mr Carmichael is also facing a formal conduct investigation by Parliamentary Standards Commissioner Kathryn Hudson.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article