JIM Murphy has launched an impassioned defence of Catholic education, days after one of his Westminster colleagues was accused of making sneering remarks about the teaching abilities of nuns.
The Scottish Labour leader has written a letter to Philip Tartaglia, Archbishop of Glasgow and President of the Bishops' Conference of Scotland, in which he insists his party recognises "how important Catholic schools are to so many families and communities across Scotland."
The move follows controversy sparked by Labour's UK shadow education secretary Tristram Hunt, who clashed with Christina Odone, a former editor of the Catholic Herald on the BBC's Question Time.
Ms Odone said: "The most inspiring teachers I've ever encountered were not out of teacher training college. You know what, they taught values, not British values, they taught real values." Mr Hunt interrupted, saying: "These were nuns. These were all nuns, weren't they?"
He then added: "I know about your religious schooling and there's a difference between a state education system having qualified teachers in the classroom."
Conservative MP Nadine Dorries condemned Mr Hunt's comments as "arrogant" and "sneering", saying they would put an end to Labour's chances of holding on to its Glasgow seats at the General Election.
However, in the letter to Tartaglia which coincides with Catholic Education Week, Mr Murphy said the faith's schools were "something to be celebrated".
The East Renfrewshire MP added: "As someone who benefitted from a Scottish Catholic education, I know how important faith schools are to our country. In all walks of Scottish public life - from politics to sport, from law to academia, and from science to education - the positive influence of Catholic education is evident.
"As you will already know the Scottish Labour Party is fully committed to Catholic education. As the leader of my party I wanted to reaffirm our commitment to Catholic schools in Scotland personally in writing to you today."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article