More localism in Scotland can help to thwart the threat of nationalism, Labour said today.
Baroness Royall of Blaisdon, the Opposition leader in the Lords, said the Scottish National Party wanted more centralism and that trend needed to be reversed.
She said many people who voted in favour of Scottish independence were not converts to nationalism but believed no one was "listening to their concerns".
"It would seem to make perfect sense that Scotland should be looking to devolve internally in the same way as England," she said in a House of Lords debate on devolution following the referendum.
"Not just to city regions around Glasgow, Dundee and Aberdeen, but to county regions too.
"More powers closer to home, for local authorities to work together, influence change and offer the promise of a better future.
"Not just to those youngsters who voted Yes but also their younger siblings who weren't yet old enough to vote but might hold similar views.
"Such an approach could also help deal with the false promises of the SNP and their political bedfellows, for whom a centralised - a more centralised - Scotland is everything."
Lady Royall warned against Conservative proposals for English votes for English laws, which she called a "purely separatist proposal" at Westminster and reiterated her party's calls for a constitutional convention.
Labour is boycotting a Cabinet committee led by leader of the House of Commons William Hague on English votes and Lady Royall warned against "partisan politics and playing people in different parts of the UK off against each another".
She told peers: "A convention, driven by the people - indeed, for the people - with views and voices from communities across our country, would mean that change could be part of addressing feelings of powerlessness in the face of globalisation and its impacts.
"The necessary further devolution to Scotland, together with the clear discontent of the British people, means it is imperative that we consider and address the English constitutional anomaly.
"England has been tolerant for a long time and I understand some of the frustrations expressed but 'English votes for English laws' is not the answer.
"The Cabinet committee chaired by William Hague, hastily convened and meeting behind closed doors, simply won't do. People will no longer tolerate a Westminster stitch-up when what our country needs is an open and transparent discussion."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article