THE SNP voiced concern at the scope of the broadcaster's shake-up being pushed through by ministers.
Culture Secretary John Whittingdale rejected fears expressed by East Dunbartonshire MP John Nicolson, a former BBC journalist, over what influence he would have regarding appointees to the BBC Trust's replacement.
It came as he was questioned by the Commons Media Committee over the Government's controversial overhaul of the corporation's royal charter.
The board will have up to 14 members, with the BBC responsible for appointing at least half of the members and the Government no more than six.
Mr Nicolson said the minister had done exactly that when he disbanded the panel selecting trustees for the National Portrait Gallery (NPG) because it rejected the five candidates he had wanted appointed.
"All of us are very concerned that you might do that with the BBC appointees. All of us on the committee are worried about BBC independence," Mr Nicolson said.
He also said Mr Whittingdale looked 'visibly uncomfortable' when pressed over the fate of the so-called 'Scottish Six' news bulletin that has been mooted for years.
Mr Nicolson said: "On the Scottish Six - Mr Whittingdale said that the BBC's role was to bring the country together. I disagree. The job of the BBC is to be editorially and journalistically independent. The Secretary of State should be playing no role in trying to influence or block a separate Scottish Six."
Meanwhile, Mr Whittingdale said a decision on whether to press ahead with the second stage of the Leveson Inquiry, into relationships between the Press and police, could be taken by the new year.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel