SCOTS have been urged to show solidarity and not "walk away" from the people of England and Wales on September 18 as a Yes vote would consign them to permanent Tory government, according to Brian Wilson, the ex-Labour Trade Minister.
The former Cunninghame North MP insisted Labour had "to do more in the months ahead" to save the Union.
He said: "It's very important for people in the rest of the United Kingdom to realise what is at stake here; it isn't just the Union but it is the prospect really of there ever being a Labour government again in what is left of the United Kingdom."
Mr Wilson agreed with the estimate that for Labour to win a future general election without Scotland, it would need an additional 250,000 votes across the remaining UK.
"Scotland needs Labour and Labour needs Scotland to win because people in Scotland, the great majority of people who vote Labour, have exactly the same social and economic interests as people in Liverpool, Newcastle and Cardiff.
"The idea that we walk away from them and leave them to permanent Tory government is anathema not just to people in what would be left of the UK but to anyone in Scotland, who has an ounce of solidarity and who has (pride in) the heritage and the history what we have achieved together."
However, it has been previously pointed out that since 1945 there would have been no general election at which Scottish independence would have changed the identity of the winning party; on only two occasions would it have converted a Labour majority into a hung parliament - 1964 and October 1974.
Without Scotland, Labour would still have won in 1945, in 1966, in 1997, in 2001 and in 2005.
Mr Wilson also spoke of a "fool's gold" being offered Scots by the Nationalists; that by opting out of the UK, they would be voting in a "left-wing little Utopia in Scotland".
He explained: "What you would have is not only a right-wing government in the rest of the UK but the highest Nationalist ambition is that rightwing government in the rest of the UK would be setting our economic policy, our interest rates, our immigration policy as well as corporation tax."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article