A FUNDAMENTAL split over the monarchy is already threatening to undermine the launch of the independence Yes campaign, the Sunday Herald can reveal.
Key differences have emerged among the partners in the cross-party movement, which includes the Greens and Scottish Socialist Party (SSP). The SSP insist an independent Scotland should be a republic, rather than have an "un-elected, unaccountable hereditary monarch".
Led by former MSP Colin Fox, the Socialists also say any second ballot question should be about a republic rather than more powers for Holyrood. The SSP's position threatens to put the monarchy back at the centre of the independence debate, undoing Alex Salmond's painstaking efforts to neutralise the issue by promising an independent Scotland will keep the Queen as head of state unless voters decide otherwise in a second referendum.
However, in their submission to the Scottish Government's consultation on the 2014 referendum, the SSP make it clear they want the monarchy to end immediately after a Yes vote.
"We do not agree with the view.. [in the consultation] that 'Her Majesty The Queen would remain as Head of State' in an Independent Scotland. In our view the will of the people must be 'sovereign' both in the outcome of this referendum and in the Governance of our country.
"Scotland needs an elected Head of State not an un-elected, unaccountable hereditary monarch and we insist this profoundly important constitutional issue be resolved as part of the post referendum negotiations with the UK Government."
The Socialists' stance could embolden republicans inside the SNP, who until now have bitten their tongues for the sake of party unity.
Last week, SNP MSP Christine Grahame exposed the tensions in the party when she wrote a magazine article pouring scorn on the Royal family. She said: "After the Diana nonsense when complete strangers lemming-like threw themselves into publicity-driven grief, through Charles and Camilla's redemption, we are now spoon-fed the William & Kate Show, the latter ironically committed like her deceased predecessor to remaining stick thin for photogenic reasons".
SSP national spokesman Colin Fox admitted his party's position on the monarchy was "difficult to reconcile" with the SNP's.
He said: "The Yes campaign cannot be dominated by one party. There will absolutely have to be agreed positions within the Yes campaign on Nato [membership] and the monarchy. These issues need to be resolved within the Yes campaign."
A Labour spokesman said: "While the SNP desperately pretend little will change with their plans for separation, the SSP show just how different a separate Scotland would be."
Yes Scotland refused to comment.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article