UKIP Scotland's first MEP has sparked an outcry after he said a narrow referendum win for Yes would not be a mandate for independence.
David Coburn said Yes should have to win 60% of the vote to secure independence but anything less could only produce more powers for the Parliament.
Lord Robertson of Port Ellen, a Labour peer, has also claimed there could "easily" be a legal challenge if a very close result produces a constitutional crisis.
The SNP last night condemned the remarks.
Coburn, elected in May, was the warm-up act for UKIP leader Nigel Farage at an event for party members in Glasgow on Friday night.
Speaking to the Sunday Herald, Coburn said a tight win for Yes this week should not mean Scotland leaving the UK.
"I don't think they have a mandate, to be frank, because you are taking an an awful lot of people out of the United Kingdom who don't even want to go," he said.
"I don't think it would be legitimate."
Still on the theme of a narrow victory for Yes, Coburn continued: "If I were Salmond, I don't think I'd say I've got a mandate for indepenence... I'd say I'd have a mandate for devo max. If he was a statesman, that's what he would say."
Asked what sort of victory would be a mandate for independence, he said: "60-40 would be fair.
"I think less than that is dangerous territory. You are depriving people of their nationality and nationhood."
Coburn's comments are reminiscent of the infamous 40% rule in the 1979 devolution referendum, when Westminster ruled that a simple majority was not sufficient for victory.
Instead, 40% of the population were required to vote for devolution, a hurdle that was not overcome.
In an interview with the Sunday Herald, the First Minister said he would be "absolutely delighted" with a 50.1% vote for Yes.
On a turnout of 80%, such a victory would represent just 7000 more votes for Yes than No, and suggest Scotland was deeply divided.
However, he added his ambition was to win "a convincing majority" that exceeded that margin. "I do have something [a figure] in mind but I'm going to leave it to the people," he said.
Meanwhile, Lord Robertson also said there could be questions over a slender Yes win this week.
Speaking to this newspaper in Edinburgh last week as polls showed the contest on a knife edge, the former defence secretary said he was not aware of any specific plans by the No campaign to challenge a narrow Yes result, but said legal challenges could "easily" arise.
He said: "The returning officer has said there can be no recount. If it's very, very tight, you know, you've got a real constitutional crisis.
"I'm sure that they [the Yes side] are massively spending at the moment outwith the rules.
"[For example] we saw at the Islay show the massive marquee that they had, hiring in pipers and things like that."
SNP MSP Humza Yousaf said: "David Coburn's latest bizarre outburst shows the panic that is gripping anti-independence politicians as more and more people wake up to the opportunities of a Yes vote. The Edinburgh Agreement commits both sides to respect the outcome of the referendum and people in Scotland rightly expect politicians on both sides to stick to that commitment."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article