The SNP has called on the BBC to answer questions over its coverage of Scotland's EU membership after a presenter appeared to give a personal view on the matter.
The party said that Andrew Marr's comments in an interview with First Minister Alex Salmond on his show today appeared to be outside the BBC's editorial guidelines.
It also said that the programme seemed to have ignored "overwhelming evidence" that Scotland would remain in the EU if it were to become independent.
The situation developed after Mr Salmond was asked about claims by European Commission president Jose Manuel Barroso that Scotland may find it ''extremely difficult, if not impossible'' to join the EU.
Mr Marr said: "I think it would be quite hard to get back in, I have to say."
Mr Salmond asked whether he was giving "the Andrew Marr analysis" and went on "I don't know, is that an individual expression? Is that the expression of the BBC?"
The presenter responded: "I've got no views on this. Nor does the BBC. I was simply reflecting on what Mr Barroso told us."
The First Minister then said: "Well you just said what your opinion was" to which Mr Marr replied: "I said I think it will be quite difficult having talked to Mr Barroso."
When he discussed the issue of Scotland's EU membership on The Andrew Marr Show last month Mr Barroso noted that Spain has been opposing the recognition of Kosovo.
The SNP said that the Scottish Parliament has heard a number of "incredibly eminent witnesses" explain how and why Scotland would continue as a member of the EU on independence.
Stewart Maxwell MSP, Convener of the Scottish Parliament's Culture Committee, said: "That appears to have been ignored by the Andrew Marr programme in favour of an opinion from the president of the Commission that has been roundly rejected by EU experts. Any assessment of the balance of evidence would show an independent Scotland continuing in the EU.
"Mr Barroso's comparison with Kosovo has been rejected by a vice president of the Commission, and his view about Scotland in Europe criticised by a former European Court judge, by a former director general of the European Commission, and by international political and academic figures.
"There are questions for the BBC to answer over their coverage of this issue. Firstly, they failed to press President Barroso about his comparison of Scotland - which has been part of the EU for over 40 years - with Kosovo. And now a presenter offers what appears to be a personal view on an independent Scotland's EU membership.
"The comments from Andrew Marr appear to be outside the BBC's editorial guidelines, and no amount of backtracking can change that."
A spokesman for the First Minister said: "The First Minister thoroughly enjoyed his appearance on the Andrew Marr Show as he always does.
"Though the specific comment made was surprising, the First Minister responded at the time and we do not intend to complain about a programme we were represented on.
"The BBC face a more generic issue in relation to referendum coverage that has been highlighted by independent academic research and it is for the BBC to explain their overall approach."
A BBC spokesman said: "Andrew himself made it clear on air that he had not been intending to express a personal opinion or that of the BBC, but was simply putting forward an argument from President Barroso who, as European Commission President, has an integral insight within the debate.
"The BBC's coverage of the Scottish Referendum debate has been fair and balanced and we will continue to report on the story without fear or favour."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article