SCOTTISH Tories last night accused David Cameron of undermining the party's leader north of the Border after the Prime Minister's U-turn on the independence referendum date.
Despairing MSPs said the party in Scotland was "not even on his radar" and accused Mr Cameron of hanging Scots leader Ruth Davidson "out to dry".
The angry comments came after the Prime Minister told a reception at the Scotland Office in London on Tuesday night he was not "too fussy" about the timing of the referendum – effectively conceding to the Nationalists' wish for a vote on separation in the autumn of 2014.
He made his comments even though Ms Davidson has fought to hold the public line that delaying the referendum date for more than two years is unacceptable.
Last night Mr Cameron was accused of having no regard at all for the views of the Scottish party.
One senior MSP told The Herald: "The real significance of this is David Cameron clearly doesn't think he has done anything wrong because the Scottish Tories are such an irrelevance we are just not on his radar. This was not wilful or deliberate or even careless. It just showed it did not occur to him the view of the Scottish party or its leader might even matter."
The anger over the latest Downing Street intervention spans all wings of the party, crossing the fault-lines of last year's leadership contest.
Some who backed Ms Davidson are furious Mr Cameron has left her "hung out to dry" while those in other camps question the point of London securing their preferred pro-Union candidate only to leave her out of the loop now.
"There is absolutely no communication from London," said another Tory MSP. "It's ridiculous. Even the Liberal Democrats are better at this."
Ms Davidson played down the latest row, saying: "The Prime Minister was simply repeating what he said on the campaign trail in Bellshill a few weeks ago. That is, while he would prefer to see a referendum sooner rather than later, having a single question in a legal, fair and decisive referendum is much more important than the date on which it is held."
The SNP seized on the remarks, questioning where it left both Ms Davidson and Scottish Secretary Michael Moore, who yesterday renewed his call for talks.
Mr Moore said: "We've always said the referendum should be sooner rather than later, and it's strange the First Minister would want to delay the referendum he's spent his professional life working towards."
The Nationalists' constitution spokesman at Westminster, Pete Wishart, said: "David Cameron's cave-in on the date of the referendum left the Scottish Secretary and indeed his own Scottish leader looking very silly – and Michael Moore has now fallen into line.
"The Westminster Government's insistence the referendum had to be in 2013 was clearly all a big act.
"Only last month Michael Moore was warning about waiting until 2014. He is left looking very silly, as his Tory warnings over the date are exposed as a sham.
"Where does the Prime Minister's 'Dover Declaration' leave the Scottish Tories? Ruth Davidson has been undermined again by David Cameron."
Former first minister Jack McConnell intervened in the debate yesterday, saying delaying the referendum to 2014 was "unacceptable".
Lord McConnell said: "Like the UK economy and economies across Europe, the Scottish
economy has real problems just now. Whatever opinions exist on both sides of the argument about Scotland's potential after a referendum, to delay this decision for another two-and-a-half years at a time of slow growth and substantial unemployment is complacent and likely to endanger the prospects of young Scots for a generation."
He added: "Anybody who is talking honestly and confidentially to business at the moment knows people are hesitating to invest in Scotland until there is a result. Both governments need to wake up and smell the coffee on this and think again. Two-and-a-half years of more uncertainty for inward investors and Scottish business will leave Scotland lagging behind. This is putting politics ahead of the jobs of ordinary people and that is unacceptable."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article