ALEX Salmond has been challenged to bring forward his blueprint for an independent Scotland by eight months after he named September 18, 2014, as the date of the referendum.
The First Minister was urged by Scottish Labour leader Johann Lamont to immediately publish the Government's White Paper, setting out detailed plans for an independent Scotland, rather than in November as is planned.
Ms Lamont told MSPs: "If we are to have the transparent debate the First Minister says he wants, why does he not publish his full independence plans now.
"Why the delay? If he wants a proper debate then he must disclose that White Paper today. If not the whole country will be asking: 'What's the plan, Alex?'"
The White Paper is being drafted by teams of civil servants in a dozen "workstreams" covering issues from defence to broadcasting.
Ms Lamont accused the First Minister of self-aggrandisement and pomposity after he claimed the Scottish Independence Referendum Bill was the most important legislation ever to have been introduced at Holyrood.
She added: "Making an occasion out of a delayed announcement is an attempt to con the people into believing we have moved a step towards independence when we haven't.
"The truth is, I believe, we have moved a step down the road of cementing Scotland's place in the United Kingdom."
Tory and Conservative MSPs also rejected Mr Salmond's claim that naming the date of the poll amounted to a historic day for Scotland.
Willie Rennie, the Scottish Liberal Democrat leader, said: "After all the build-up, this looks like one of those occasions when the trailer is more exciting than the movie."
Scots Tory leader Ruth Davidson said: "After waiting two years the people of Scotland deserved to know when they will go to the polls.
"The First Minister now needs to considerably up his game, which means no more misinformation and baseless assertion.
"Voters deserve nothing less than the full facts of what a separate Scotland would look like."
The date was announced by Mr Salmond as the Government published its Referendum Bill.
It confirmed the question: "Should Scotland be an independent county?" and included a sample ballot paper.
The bill, expected to become law by December, also gave the Electoral Commission independent elections watchdog a role overseeing the poll.
In a brief statement to MSPs, Mr Salmond said: "A Yes vote means a future where we can be absolutely certain, 100% certain, that the people of Scotland will get the government they vote for."
Commenting later, he said: "September 18, 2014, can be a date which becomes etched in our nation's story as the day Scotland took a decisive step forward to a better, fairer future."
He was backed by Patrick Harvie, leader of the pro-independence Scottish Greens, who said: "Now we have the date for our diaries the effort to persuade those who are undecided must focus on the needs of real people and not just those with loud voices and deep pockets.
"We believe many more Scots can be be persuaded to vote Yes by a positive vision of a Scotland that serves the people's interests, rather than corporate interests."
Blair Jenkins, head of the pro-independence Yes Scotland campaign, said: "September 18, next year, represents a huge opportunity for Scotland because on that day we can move Scotland on to a new and better path."
However, Secretary of State for Scotland Michael Moore said: "I am confident when Scots go to the polls they will vote in favour of Scotland staying within a strong and secure UK family."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article