ALEX Salmond insists an independent Scotland would retain full tax and spending powers.
This comes despite the Governor of the Bank of England's warning it would have to cede some financial sovereignty in a currency union with the UK.
The First Minister, in his most detailed response to Mark Carney's intervention earlier this week, made it clear the SNP Government following independence would be happy to hand control over monetary policy to the Bank but stressed that "doesn't cover the rates of taxation; I don't think there's any need for that".
Mr Salmond again repeated his threat that if the UK refused to join a currency union - Chancellor George Osborne has said it is "highly unlikely" - an independent Scotland would be entitled not to accept responsibility for a share of UK debt, the "legal liability of Her Majesty's Treasury".
But last night Ed Balls, in his first response to the Governor's remarks, insisted the First Minister could "not run away from the difficult questions".
In a speech in East Ayrshire, the Shadow Chancellor said: "The Governor's important speech is a wake-up call to those who want to avoid discussing what the economic consequences of breaking-up the UK would be for Scotland.
"He was clear the eurozone showed currency union without fiscal union won't work. But the SNP immediately rejected fiscal union. Salmond's rejection of the key test set by the Governor makes an already flawed proposal even more unworkable," said Mr Balls.
He said Mr Salmond could not claim Scotland could keep the pound. "He simply cannot make that promise because it would take both sides to agree. The only way to guarantee the pound is to stay in the UK."
Elsewhere in his speech, the Shadow Chancellor made it clear Labour was committed to delivering a surplus on the current budget and to reducing national debt. " But we will make different choices to get the deficit down in a fairer way," he said.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article